<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленец</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2218-5003</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2686-7923</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-1-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">NYJPSB</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="uri">https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2023/1190</article-id><self-uri>https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2023/1190</self-uri><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Экосистемы фирм: формирование исследовательской программы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Firms’ ecosystems: Developing a research programme</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Попов</surname><given-names>Евгений Васильевич</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Попов</surname><given-names>Евгений Васильевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Popov</surname><given-names>Evgeny V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>epopov@mail.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Ural Institute of Management (RANEPA) (Ekaterinburg, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Уральский институт управления РАНХиГС (г. Екатеринбург, РФ)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-03"><day>03</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>2</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-11-02"><day>02</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-12-28"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY-NC 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Управление внешней средой фирмы требует учета не только отношений с хозяйственными партнерами, но и влияния различных элементов ее экосистемы. Статья посвящена разработке этапов и методов оценки формирования экосистемы на основе научного обзора. Методология исследования базируется на институциональной экономической теории и концепции экосистем. Использован метод системного логического анализа. Информационную основу работы составили научные публикации, проиндексированные в международных базах данных Web of Science Core Collection и Scopus в 2015–2022 гг. На основе анализа данных публикаций дано определение устойчивой экосистемы фирмы, которая понимается как внешняя среда субъекта хозяйствования с наиболее полным набором элементов инфраструктуры, стабильными сетевыми взаимодействиями, наиболее полным применением цифровых технологий, необходимым институциональным обеспечением и оптимальными трансакционными издержками. Выделены пять этапов оценки факторов формирования устойчивой экосистемы фирмы – инфраструктурного, сетевого, цифрового, институционального и затратного. Указанные факторы обеспечивают преимущества устойчивой экосистемы, заключающиеся в разнообразии хозяйственной деятельности, постоянстве отношений, быстроте принятия решений, стабильности стратегического развития и снижении издержек на поддержание экосистемы. Научная новизна полученного результата заключается в систематизации этапов и методов формирования устойчивой экосистемы фирмы на основе институциональной экономической теории, дополняющей существующие методы оценки бизнес-экосистем. Определены направления дальнейших исследований, предусматривающие углубление и расширение аппарата оценки различных аспектов обеспечения функционирования экосистемы фирмы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Managing a firm’s external environment involves considering not only relationships with economic partners, but also the influence of various elements of its ecosystem. In the article, we develop stages and methods for assessing the formation of an ecosystem based on a scientific review. The theoretical framework of the study is institutional economics and the concept of ecosystem. The method of system logical analysis was used. The research data are retrieved from scientific papers indexed in the global databases Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus in 2015–2022. Having analyzed the existing literature, we formulated the definition of a firm’s sustainable ecosystem interpreted as the external environment of a business entity with a comprehensive set of infrastructure elements, stable network interactions, the extensive use of digital technologies, the essential institutional support, and optimal transaction costs. In the formation of a firm’s sustainable ecosystem, there are five stages providing for the development of infrastructural, network, digital, institutional, and financial parameters of this system. These factors ensure the benefits of a sustainable ecosystem consisting in diverse economic activities, strong relationships, fast decision-making, stable strategic development, and reduced costs for maintaining the ecosystem. The novelty of the study lies in the systematization of the stages and methods for the formation of a firm’s sustainable ecosystem based on institutional economics, which adds to the existing methods for assessing business ecosystems. We have highlighted the avenues for further studies on expanding the toolkit for evaluating various aspects of a firm’s ecosystem functioning.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экосистема;</kwd><kwd>фирма;</kwd><kwd>инфраструктура;</kwd><kwd>сети;</kwd><kwd>цифровизация;</kwd><kwd>институциональный атлас;</kwd><kwd>трансакционная функция.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>ecosystem;</kwd><kwd>firm;</kwd><kwd>infrastructure;</kwd><kwd>networks;</kwd><kwd>digitalization;</kwd><kwd>institutional atlas;</kwd><kwd>transactional function</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда в рамках научного проекта № 22-28-20077.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The paper was funded by the Russian Science Foundation within the research project no. 22-28-20077.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alikaeva M.V., Aslanova L.O., Shinakhov A.A. (2020). Theories of socio-economic ecosystems: Patterns and development trends. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologiy / Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 284–288. DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-284-288. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Astafyeva O.E. (2021). Methodological basis for managing the sustainable development of enterprises. Upravlencheskiy uchet / Management Accounting, no. 12, pp. 621–626. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vinokhodova I.G., Kuleva L.V. (2021). Overview of the modern ecosystem of Rosselkhozbank. Izvestiya Velikolukskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii / Journal of the Velikie Luki State Agricultural Academy, no. 4(37), pp. 53–58. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vishnyagova E.A., Solovyeva I.A. (2022). Ecosystem as a mechanism for sustainable development of industry. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Ekonomika i menedzhment» / Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Economics and Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 62–76. DOI: 10.14529/em220106. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Volchik V.V., Maslyukova E.V., Panteeva S.A. (2021). Investigating the approaches to national innovation systems modeling. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz / Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 135–150. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.8. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galeeva G.M., Mingazova A.I. (2019). Scientific review of the main approaches to the definition of the business ecosystem. Nauchnye trudy Tsentra perspektivnykh ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy / Scientific Works of the Center for Advanced Economic Research, no. 17, pp. 35–45. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golovina A.N., Potanin V.V. (2021). Development of theoretical foundations of the formation of industrial enterprises’ ecosystems. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, parvo / Society: Politics, Economics, Law, no. 12, pp. 52–56. DOI: 10.24158/pep.2021.12.8. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kafiyatullina Yu.N., Panfilova E.E. (2021). Business ecosystem sustainability management. Upravlenie / Management, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 33–42. DOI: 10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-33-42. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A., Karpinskaya V.A. (2020). Development of ecosystems in the financial sector of Russia. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2–15. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-1. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ovchinnikova A.V., Zimin S.D. (2021). The birth of the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems and its evolution. Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo / Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1497–1514. DOI: 10.18334/ epp.11.6.112307. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov E.V., Konovalov A.A. (2008). Information cost optimization model. Problemy upravleniya / Management Problems, no. 3, pp. 35–45. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A., Simonova V.L. (2017). The concept of network firm’s potential. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii / The Russian Journal of Economic Theory, no. 1, pp. 93–101. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov E.V., Simonova V.L. (2022). Potential of a company’s ecosystem digitalization. Voprosy upravleniya / Management Issues, no. 1(74), pp. 34–46. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2022-1-34-46. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Potanin V.V., Golovina A.N. (2022). Structure of social stability of industrial ecosystems. Sotsialnye i ekonomicheskie sistemy. Ekonomika / Social and Economic Systems. Economy, no. 6.2, pp. 195–204. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ramenskaya L.A. (2020). The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 16–28. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stepanova V.V., Ukhanova A.V., Grigorishin A.V., Yakhyaev D.B. (2019). Evaluating digital ecosystems in Russia’s regions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz / Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 73–90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.4. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Akatkin Y.M., Karpov O.E., Konyavskiy V.A., Yasinovskaya E.D. (2017). Digital economy: Conceptual architecture of a digital economic sector ecosystem. Business Informatics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 17–35. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2017.4.17.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Audretsch D.B., Belitski M., Guerrero M. (2022). The dynamic contribution of innovation ecosystems to Schumpeterian firms: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Business Research, vol. 144, pp. 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bruce E., Shurong Z., Egala S.B., Amoah J., Ying D., Rui H., Lyu T. (2022). Social media usage and SME firms’ sustainability: An introspective analysis from Ghana. Sustainability, vol. 14(15), 9433, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Calabrese M., Sala A.L., Fuller R.P., Laudando A. (2021). Digital platform ecosystems for sustainable innovation: Toward a new meta-organizational model? Administrative Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, 119, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Derks M., Oukes T., Romijn H. (2022). Scaling inclusive business impacts at the base of Pyramid: A framework inspired by business model ecosystems research. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 366, 132875, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.132875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eriksson T., Nappa A., Robertson J. (2022). All for one and one for all: Encouraging ecosystem citizenship behaviour to strengthen employer branding. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 38, issue 2, 101211, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scaman.2022.101211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gawer A. (2022). Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation: Organization &amp; Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1965888</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ghio N., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C. (2019). The creation of high-tech ventures in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Exploring the interactions among university knowledge, cooperative banks, and individual attitudes. Small Business Economics, vol. 52, pp. 523–543. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-017-9958-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gifford E., McKelvey M., Saemundsson R. (2020). The evolution of knowledge-intensive innovation ecosystems: Co-evolving entrepreneurial activity and innovation police in the West Swedish maritime system. Industry and Innovation, vol. 28, issue 5, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1856047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gu Y., Hu L., Hou C. (2022). Leveraging diverse ecosystem partners for innovation: The roles of regional innovation environment and partnership heterogeneity. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrazivanja, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331 677X.2022.2082997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Han J., Zhou H., Lowik S., Weerd-Nederhof P. (2022). Enhancing the understanding of ecosystems under innovation management context: Aggregating conceptual boundaries of ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 106, pp. 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hein A., Schreieck M., Riasanow T., Setzke D.S., Wiesche M., Bohm M., Krcmar H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, vol. 30, pp. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holgersson M., Baldwin C.Y., Chesbrough H., Bogers M.L.A.M. (2022). The forces of ecosystem evolution. California Management Review, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221086038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jacobides M.G., Brusoni S., Candelon F. (2021). The evolutionary dynamics of the artificial intelligence ecosystem. Strategy Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 412–435. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jin M., Kim B. (2022). The effects of ESG activity recognition of corporate employees on job performance: The case of South Korea. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, no. 7, 316, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson E., Hemmatian I., Lanahan L., Josti A.M. (2022). A framework and databases for measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, vol. 51, issue 2, 104398, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104398</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kanda W., Geissdoerfer M., Hjelm O. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, issue 6, pp. 2814–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kansheba J.M.P. (2020). Small business and entrepreneurship in Africa: The nexus of entrepreneurial ecosystems and productive entrepreneurship. Small Enterprise Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2020.1761869</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J., Paek B., Lee H. (2022). Exploring innovation ecosystem in incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities: Automobile firms. Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, 1606, pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kolagar M., Parida V., Sjodin D. (2022). Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, vol. 146, pp. 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koval V., Olczak P., Vdovenko N., Boiko O., Matuszewska D., Mikhno I. (2021). Ecosystem of environmentally sustainable municipal infrastructure in Ukraine. Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, 10223, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kretschmer T., Leiponen A., Schilling M., Vasudeva G. (2020). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, issue 10, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Linde L., Sjodin D., Parida V., Wincent J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change, vol. 166, 120614, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lingens B., Huber F., Gassmann O. (2022). Loner, or team player: How firms allocate orchestrator tasks amongst ecosystem actors. European Management Journal, vol. 40, issue 4, pp. 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu B., Shao Y.-F., Liu G., Ni D. (2022). An evolutionary analysis of relational governance in an innovation ecosystem. SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moore J.F. (1997). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Collins.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nepelski D., Van Roy V. (2020). Innovation and innovator assessment in R&amp;I ecosystems: The case of the EU Framework Program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1–36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oghazi P., Parida V., Wincent J., Mostaghel R. (2022). Ecosystem transformation through disruptive innovation: A definition, framework, and outline for future research. Journal of Business Research, vol. 147, pp. 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oskam I., Bossink B., de Man A.-P. (2020). Valuing value in innovation ecosystems: How cross-sector actors overcome tensions in collaborative sustainable business model development. Business &amp; Society, vol. 60, issue 5, pp. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320907145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palmie M., Miehe L., Oghazi P., Paarida V., Wincent J. (2022). The evolution of the digital ecosystem and digital business model innovation in retail: The emergence of meta-ecosystems and the value of physical interactions. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change, vol. 177, 121496, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121496</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov E., Dolghenko R., Simonova V., Chelak I. (2021). Analytical model of innovation ecosystem development. E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 250, 01004, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125001004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov E.V. (2008). Transaction function. International Advances in Economic Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 474–475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov E.V. (2011). Institutional atlas. Atlantic Economic Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 445–446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Requelme-Medina M., Stevenson M., Barrales-Molina V. (2022). Coopetition in business ecosystems: The key role of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Journal of Business Research, vol. 146, pp. 464–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.busres.2022.03.071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Riasanow T., Jantgen L., Hermes S., Bohm M., Krcmar H. (2021). Core, intertwined, and ecosystem-specific clusters in platform ecosystems: Analyzing similarities in the digital transformation of the automotive, blockchain, financial, insurance and IIoT industry. Electronic Markets, vol. 31, pp. 89–104. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00407-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simmonds H., Gazley A., Kaartemo V., Renton M., Hooper V. (2021). Mechanisms of service ecosystem emergence: Exploring the case of public digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, vol. 137, pp. 100–115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tabas A.M., Komulainen H., Natti S. (2022). Typology and dynamics of actor’ roles and positions within entrepreneurial ecosystems: An exploratory study. Small Enterprise Research, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2022.2086611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Talmar M., Walrave B., Podoynitsyna K.S., Holmstrom J. (2020). Mapping, analyzing, and designing ecosystems: The ecosystem pie model. Long Range Planning, vol. 53, issue 4, 101850, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thompson F.M., Brouthers K.D. (2021). Digital consumer engagement: National cultural differences and cultural tightness. Journal of International Marketing, vol. 29, issue 4, pp. 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211005729</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uzunca B., Sharapov D., Tee R. (2022). Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems. Research Policy, vol. 51, no. 104560, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2082997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Visscher K., Hahn K., Konrad K. (2021). Innovation ecosystem strategies of industrial firms: A multilayered approach to alignment and strategic positioning. Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 30, issue 3, pp. 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12429</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Аликаева М.В., Асланова Л.О., Шинахов А.А. (2020). Теории социально-экономических систем: закономерности и тенденции развития // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий. Т. 82, № 3. С. 284–288. DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2020-3-284-288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Астафьева О.Е. (2021). Методологическая основа управления устойчивым развитием предприятий // Управленческий учет. № 12. С. 621–626.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Виноходова И.Г., Кулева Л.В. (2021). Обзор современной экосистемы Россельхозбанка // Известия Великолукской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. № 4 (37). С. 53–58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Вишнягова Е.А., Соловьева И.А. (2022). Экосистема как механизм устойчивого развития промышленности // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Экономика и менеджмент». Т. 16, № 1. С. 62–76. DOI: 10.14529/em220106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Вольчик В.В., Маслюкова Е.В., Пантеева С.А. (2021). Исследование подходов к моделированию национальных инновационных систем // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 14, № 5. С. 135–150. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref63"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Галеева Г.М., Мингазова А.И. (2019). Научный обзор основных подходов к определению экосистемы бизнеса // Научные труды Центра перспективных экономических исследований. № 17. С. 35–45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref64"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Головина А.Н., Потанин В.В. (2021). Развитие теоретических основ формирования экосистем промышленных предприятий // Общество: политика, экономика, право. № 12. С. 52–56. DOI: 10.24158/pep.2021.12.8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref65"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кафиятуллина Ю.Н., Панфилова Е.Е. (2021). Управление устойчивостью экосистемы бизнеса // Управление. Т. 10, № 2. С. 33–42. DOI: 10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-33-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref66"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Клейнер Г.Б., Рыбачук М.А., Карпинская В.А. (2020). Развитие экосистем в финансовом секторе России // Управленец. Т. 11, № 4. С. 2–15. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003-2020-1-4-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref67"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Овчинникова А.В., Зимин С.Д. (2021). Рождение концепции предпринимательских экосистем и ее эволюция // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. Т. 11, № 6. С. 1497–1514. DOI: 10.18334/epp.11.6.112307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref68"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Попов Е.В., Коновалов А.А. (2008). Модель оптимизации издержек информации // Проблемы управления. № 3. С. 35–45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref69"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Попов Е.В., Семячков К.А., Симонова В.Л. (2017). Концепция сетевого потенциала фирмы // Журнал экономической теории. № 1. С. 93–101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref70"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Попов Е.В., Симонова В.Л. (2022). Потенциал цифровизации экосистемы фирмы // Вопросы управления. № 1 (74). С. 34–46. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2022-1-34-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref71"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Потанин В.В., Головина А.Н. (2022). Структура социальной устойчивости промышленных экосистем // Социальные и экономические системы. Экономика. № 6.2. С. 195–204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref72"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Раменская Л.А. (2020). Применение концепции экосистем в экономико-управленческих исследованиях // Управленец. Т. 11, № 4. С. 16–28. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003-2020-11-4-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref73"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Степанова В.В., Уханова А.В., Григоришин А.В., Яхяев Д.Б. (2019). Оценка цифровых экосистем регионов России // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 12, № 2. С. 73–90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref74"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akatkin Y.M., Karpov O.E., Konyavskiy V.A., Yasinovskaya E.D. (2017). Digital economy: Conceptual architecture of a digital economic sector ecosystem. Business Informatics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 17–35. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2017.4.17.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref75"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Audretsch D.B., Belitski M., Guerrero M. (2022). The dynamic contribution of innovation ecosystems to Schumpeterian firms: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Business Research, vol. 144, pp. 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref76"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bruce E., Shurong Z., Egala S.B., Amoah J., Ying D., Rui H., Lyu T. (2022). Social media usage and SME firms’ sustainability: An introspective analysis from Ghana. Sustainability, vol. 14(15), 9433, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref77"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Calabrese M., Sala A.L., Fuller R.P., Laudando A. (2021). Digital platform ecosystems for sustainable innovation: Toward a new meta-organizational model? Administrative Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, 119, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref78"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derks M., Oukes T., Romijn H. (2022). Scaling inclusive business impacts at the base of Pyramid: A framework inspired by business model ecosystems research. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 366, 132875, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.132875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref79"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eriksson T., Nappa A., Robertson J. (2022). All for one and one for all: Encouraging ecosystem citizenship behaviour to strengthen employer branding. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 38, issue 2, 101211, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scaman.2022.101211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref80"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gawer A. (2022). Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation: Organization &amp; Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1965888</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref81"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ghio N., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C. (2019). The creation of high-tech ventures in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Exploring the interactions among university knowledge, cooperative banks, and individual attitudes. Small Business Economics, vol. 52, pp. 523–543. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-017-9958-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref82"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gifford E., McKelvey M., Saemundsson R. (2020). The evolution of knowledge-intensive innovation ecosystems: Co-evolving entrepreneurial activity and innovation police in the West Swedish maritime system. Industry and Innovation, vol. 28, issue 5, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1856047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref83"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gu Y., Hu L., Hou C. (2022). Leveraging diverse ecosystem partners for innovation: The roles of regional innovation environment and partnership heterogeneity. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrazivanja, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331 677X.2022.2082997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref84"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Han J., Zhou H., Lowik S., Weerd-Nederhof P. (2022). Enhancing the understanding of ecosystems under innovation management context: Aggregating conceptual boundaries of ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 106, pp. 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref85"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hein A., Schreieck M., Riasanow T., Setzke D.S., Wiesche M., Bohm M., Krcmar H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, vol. 30, pp. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref86"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Holgersson M., Baldwin C.Y., Chesbrough H., Bogers M.L.A.M. (2022). The forces of ecosystem evolution. California Management Review, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221086038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref87"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jacobides M.G., Brusoni S., Candelon F. (2021). The evolutionary dynamics of the artificial intelligence ecosystem. Strategy Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 412–435. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref88"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jin M., Kim B. (2022). The effects of ESG activity recognition of corporate employees on job performance: The case of South Korea. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, no. 7, 316, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref89"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson E., Hemmatian I., Lanahan L., Josti A.M. (2022). A framework and databases for measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, vol. 51, issue 2, 104398, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104398</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref90"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kanda W., Geissdoerfer M., Hjelm O. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, issue 6, pp. 2814–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref91"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kansheba J.M.P. (2020). Small business and entrepreneurship in Africa: The nexus of entrepreneurial ecosystems and productive entrepreneurship. Small Enterprise Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2020.1761869</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref92"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J., Paek B., Lee H. (2022). Exploring innovation ecosystem in incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities: Automobile firms. Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, 1606, pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref93"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolagar M., Parida V., Sjodin D. (2022). Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, vol. 146, pp. 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref94"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koval V., Olczak P., Vdovenko N., Boiko O., Matuszewska D., Mikhno I. (2021). Ecosystem of environmentally sustainable municipal infrastructure in Ukraine. Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, 10223, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref95"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kretschmer T., Leiponen A., Schilling M., Vasudeva G. (2020). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, issue 10, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref96"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Linde L., Sjodin D., Parida V., Wincent J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change, vol. 166, 120614, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref97"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lingens B., Huber F., Gassmann O. (2022). Loner, or team player: How firms allocate orchestrator tasks amongst ecosystem actors. European Management Journal, vol. 40, issue 4, pp. 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref98"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu B., Shao Y.-F., Liu G., Ni D. (2022). An evolutionary analysis of relational governance in an innovation ecosystem. SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref99"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moore J.F. (1997). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Collins.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref100"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nepelski D., Van Roy V. (2020). Innovation and innovator assessment in R&amp;I ecosystems: The case of the EU Framework Program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1–36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref101"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oghazi P., Parida V., Wincent J., Mostaghel R. (2022). Ecosystem transformation through disruptive innovation: A definition, framework, and outline for future research. Journal of Business Research, vol. 147, pp. 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref102"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oskam I., Bossink B., de Man A.-P. (2020). Valuing value in innovation ecosystems: How cross-sector actors overcome tensions in collaborative sustainable business model development. Business &amp; Society, vol. 60, issue 5, pp. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320907145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref103"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palmie M., Miehe L., Oghazi P., Paarida V., Wincent J. (2022). The evolution of the digital ecosystem and digital business model innovation in retail: The emergence of meta-ecosystems and the value of physical interactions. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change, vol. 177, 121496, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121496</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref104"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E., Dolghenko R., Simonova V., Chelak I. (2021). Analytical model of innovation ecosystem development. E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 250, 01004, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125001004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref105"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E.V. (2008). Transaction function. International Advances in Economic Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 474–475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref106"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E.V. (2011). Institutional atlas. Atlantic Economic Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 445–446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref107"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Requelme-Medina M., Stevenson M., Barrales-Molina V. (2022). Coopetition in business ecosystems: The key role of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Journal of Business Research, vol. 146, pp. 464–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.busres.2022.03.071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref108"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Riasanow T., Jantgen L., Hermes S., Bohm M., Krcmar H. (2021). Core, intertwined, and ecosystem-specific clusters in platform ecosystems: Analyzing similarities in the digital transformation of the automotive, blockchain, financial, insurance and IIoT industry. Electronic Markets, vol. 31, pp. 89–104. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00407-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref109"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simmonds H., Gazley A., Kaartemo V., Renton M., Hooper V. (2021). Mechanisms of service ecosystem emergence: Exploring the case of public digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, vol. 137, pp. 100–115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref110"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tabas A.M., Komulainen H., Natti S. (2022). Typology and dynamics of actor’ roles and positions within entrepreneurial ecosystems: An exploratory study. Small Enterprise Research, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2022.2086611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref111"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Talmar M., Walrave B., Podoynitsyna K.S., Holmstrom J. (2020). Mapping, analyzing, and designing ecosystems: The ecosystem pie model. Long Range Planning, vol. 53, issue 4, 101850, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref112"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thompson F.M., Brouthers K.D. (2021). Digital consumer engagement: National cultural differences and cultural tightness. Journal of International Marketing, vol. 29, issue 4, pp. 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211005729</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref113"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uzunca B., Sharapov D., Tee R. (2022). Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems. Research Policy, vol. 51, no. 104560, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2082997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref114"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Visscher K., Hahn K., Konrad K. (2021). Innovation ecosystem strategies of industrial firms: A multilayered approach to alignment and strategic positioning. Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 30, issue 3, pp. 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12429</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
