<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленец</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2218-5003</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2686-7923</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-3-4</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">OXGZDM</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="uri">https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2023/1290</article-id><self-uri>https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2023/1290</self-uri><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Моделирование стейкхолдерской стоимости корпоративной сети, создаваемой в процессе реализации политики социальной ответственности</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Modelling a corporate network’s stakeholder value created amid CSR policy implementation</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ткаченко</surname><given-names>Ирина Николаевна</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ткаченко</surname><given-names>Ирина Николаевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tkachenko</surname><given-names>Irina N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>tkachenko@usue.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Метелева</surname><given-names>Марина Анатольевна</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Метелева</surname><given-names>Марина Анатольевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Meteleva</surname><given-names>Marina A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>imr42meteleva@gmail.com</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Ural State University of Economics (Ekaterinburg, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Уральский государственный экономический университет (г. Екатеринбург, РФ)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute for Management Research (Kemerovo, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт научных исследований проблем управления (г. Кемерово, РФ)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-07-06"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-01-18"><day>18</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2023-03-15"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY-NC 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Исследование направлено на развитие методических подходов к оценке стейкхолдерской стоимости корпоративной сети, создаваемой в процессе реализации политики корпоративной социальной ответственности (КСО) в условиях непрогнозируемых изменений внешней среды. Методологическую основу работы составили теория сетей, стейкхолдерский подход и концепция корпоративной социальной ответственности. В качестве методов использовались нарративный, корреляционный, регрессионный и сравнительный анализ. Информационной базой работы послужили данные Федеральной службы государственной статистики по регионам России за 2012–2021 гг., рейтинги агентства RAEX и данные Московской биржи. Сформирован авторский методический подход к оценке стейкхолдерской стоимости корпоративной сети, создаваемой в процессе реализации политики КСО. Предложенная методика протестирована на данных финансовой отчетности ПАО «Норильский никель» и показателях социально-экономического развития внешней среды корпорации – Красноярского края. Установлено, что указанная политика влияет на группы стейкхолдеров «Предпринимательская среда» и «Природная среда». Наибольшая реакция на мероприятия КСО наблюдается в группах стейкхолдеров «Население» и «Инвесторы». В период кризиса COVID-19 связи «корпорация – население – корпорация» через систему показателей «годовой размер оплаты труда – уровень безработицы в субъекте РФ – чистая прибыль предприятия» утратили устойчивость: произошло их «сжатие» при сохранении общих пропорций вкладов и выгод стейкхолдеров. Дальнейшие направления исследований предусматривают расширение состава акторов корпоративной сети.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article aims to develop methodological approaches to assessing the stakeholder value of a corporation in the process of implementing the policy of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the face of unpredictable changes in the external environment. Network theory and the concept of corporate social responsibility constitute the methodological framework of the study. The methods used are narrative, correlation, regression and comparative analysis. The empirical evidence covers the data provided by the Federal State Statistics Service on the Russian regions for 2012–2021, RAEX rankings, and listings of the Moscow Exchange. The authors substantiate their own approach to assessing a corporate network’s stakeholder value created in the process of implementing CSR policy. The proposed method is tested using PAO Norilsk Nickel’s financial statements and the socio-economic development indicators of Krasnoyarsk krai as the corporation’s external environment. The research demonstrates that CSR policy has an effect on Business Environment and Natural Environment stakeholder groups, while the most profound response to CSR activities were observed in Population and Investors stakeholder groups. During the COVID-19 crisis, the ‘Corporation – Population – Corporation’ relationship model through the system of indicators ‘Annual wage – RF region’s unemployment rate – Enterprise net profit’ lost its indicativeness: there was a ‘compression’ of network relationships as a reaction to changing environmental conditions. Among the directions for further research is expanding the composition of the corporate network’s actors.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>корпоративное управление;</kwd><kwd>стейкхолдерский подход;</kwd><kwd>сеть стейкхолдеров;</kwd><kwd>корпоративная социальная ответственность;</kwd><kwd>COVID-19.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>corporate governance;</kwd><kwd>stakeholder approach;</kwd><kwd>stakeholder network;</kwd><kwd>corporate social responsibility;</kwd><kwd>COVID-19.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дубровский В.Ж. (2004). Экономическая природа корпорации // Известия Уральского государственного экономического университета. № 8. С. 10–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Заруцкая В.С., Орехова С.В. (2021). Управление сетевым взаимодействием организации на основе затратно-стоимостного подхода // Финансы и управление. № 4. С. 1–20. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7802.2021.4.36627.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ивашковская И.В. (2012). Стейкхолдерский подход к управлению, ориентированному на приращение стоимости компании // Корпоративные финансы. Т. 6, № 1(21). С. 14–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Когденко В.Г., Мельник М.В. (2018). Современные тенденции в бизнес-анализе: исследование экосистемы компании, анализ информационной составляющей бизнес-модели, оценка возможностей роста // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. Т. 16, № 1. С. 38–57. https://doi.org/10.24891/re.16.1.38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Макеева Ю.В., Ивашковская И.В., Ружанская Л.С., Попов К.А. (2021). Взаимосвязь социально-экономического развития регионов и корпоративных рейтингов российских компаний // Экономика региона. Т. 17, вып. 1. С. 86–102. https://doi.org/10.17059/econ.reg.2021-1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Метелева М.А. (2022). Проектирование предпринимательских сетей: развитие методики оценки сетевого потенциала корпораций Арктической зоны Российской Федерации // Север и рынок: формирование экономического порядка. № 3. С. 19–35. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.3.2022.77.002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рябова Л.А. (2017). Социальная лицензия на деятельность добывающих компаний и достижение социальной устойчивости муниципалитетов Арктики: зарубежный опыт // Север и рынок: формирование экономического порядка. № 4 (55). С. 34–49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ткаченко И.Н. (2021). Актуализация стейкхолдерского подхода корпоративного управления в условиях коронакризиса: от декларирования приверженности к прикладным моделям // Управленец. Т. 12, № 2. С. 2–16. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-2-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ткаченко И.Н., Злыгостев А.А. (2018). Оценка вклада стейкхолдеров в стоимость компании: пример российского банковского сектора // Управленец. Т. 9, № 4. С. 40–52. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-4-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Филипс Д., Гарсиа-Диас А. (1984). Методы анализа сетей. Москва: Мир.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Banerjee S., Homroy S., Slechten A. (2022). Stakeholder preference and strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 77, 102286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102286</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barry J.W., Campello M., Graham J.R., Ma Y. (2022). Corporate flexibility in a time of crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 144, issue 3, pp. 780–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boutilier R.G., Thomson I. (2011). Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. http://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burt R.S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 6, pp. 79–141.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cader J., Koneczna R., Smol M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility as a significant factor of competitive advantage – a case study of energy companies in Poland. Energy Reports, no. 8, pp. 7989–8001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen C.-C., Khan A., Hongsuchon T., Ruangkanjanases A., Chen Y.-T., Sivarak O., Chen S.-C. (2021). The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate image in times of crisis: The mediating role of customer trust. InternationalJournal Environmental Research Public Health, no. 18, 8275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18168275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Darendeli A., Fiechter P., Hitz J.-M., Lehmann N. (2022). The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage. Journal of Accounting and Economics, no. 74, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101525</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eerola T.T. (2021). New low-impact mineral exploration technologies and the social license to explore: Insights from corporate websites in Finland. Cleaner Environmental Systems, no. 3, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Firmansyah A., Arham A., Qadri R.A., Wibowo P., Irawan F., Kustiani N.A., Wijaya S., Andriani A.F., Arfiansyah Z., Kurniawati L., Mabrur A., Dinarjito A., Kusumawati R., Mahrus M.L. (2022). Political connections, investment opportunity sets, tax avoidance: Does corporate social responsibility disclosure in Indonesia have a role? Heliyon, no. 8, e10155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Freeman R.E. (2001). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie, vol. 3, 144. https://academic.udayton.edu</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gilsbach L., Schütte P., Franken G. (2022). Water reporting in mining: Are corporates losing sight of stakeholder interests? Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 345, 131016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holmberg S.R., Cummings J.L. (2009). Building successful strategic alliances. Strategic process and analytical tool for selecting partner industries and firms. Long Range Planning, no. 42, pp. 164–193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ibáñez-Forés V., Martínez-Sánchez V., Valls-Val K., Bovea M.D. (2023). How do organisations communicate aspects related to their social performance? A proposed set of indicators and metrics for sustainability reporting. Sustainable Production and Consumption, no. 35, pp. 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee W.J., Choi S.U. (2021). Internal and external corporate social responsibility activities and firm value: Evidence from the shared growth in the supply chain. Borsa Istanbul Review, no. 21-S1, S57eS69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Matsutani L., Rampasso I.S., Serafim M.P., Quelhas O.L.G., Filhoe W.L., Anholon R. (2022). Critical analysis of corporate social responsibility projects developed by Brazilian companies: Providing new insights for debates. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, no. 7, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mulder C., Perrelli R., Rocha M. (2002). The role of corporate, legal and macroeconomic balance sheet indicators in crisis detection and prevention. IMF Working Paper. International Monetary Fund.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Newman M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 167–256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paunović B. (2012). The role of corporate entrepreneurship in solving the competitiveness crisis of large companies. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 60, issuse 7-8, pp. 343–354. DOI: 10.5937/ecopre1208343p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pfajfar G., Shoham A., Małecka A., Zalaznik M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, no. 143, pp. 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popkova E., DeLo P., Sergic B.S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility amid social distancing during the COVID-19 crisis: BRICS vs. OECD countries. Research in International Business and Finance, no. 55, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prasad M., Mishra T., Bapat V. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Evidence from India using energy intensity as an indicator of environmental sustainability. IIMB Management Review, no. 31, pp. 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sergeeva N., Kapetanaki E. (2022). Corporate social responsibility as a strategic narrative: The cases of UK project-based organizations. Project Leadership and Society, no. 3, 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spaniol M.J., Rowland N.J. (2022). Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region Matthew. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change, no. 184, 121966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121966</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stout L.A. (2005). On the nature of corporations. Cornell Law Faculty Publications Paper, no. 1, pp. 252–268. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/717</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tkachenko I.N., Pervukhina I.V., Zlygostev A.A. (2020). Modeling the contribution and benefits of company stakeholders. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2–15. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-2-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tseng T.-Y. (2022). Influences of Taiwan’s corporate social responsibility report management policy on the information transparency of its capital market. Borsa Istanbul Review, no. 22-3, 487e497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zakharia Z., Menashy F. (2020). The emerging role of corporate actors as policymakers in education in emergencies: Evidence from the Syria refugee crisis. Journal on Education in Emergencies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 40–70. https://inee.org/evidence/journal</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dubrovskiy V.Zh. (2004). The economic nature of the corporation. Izvestiya Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta / Journal of the Ural State University of Economics, no. 8, pp. 10–23. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zarutskaya V.S., Orekhova S.V. (2021). Corporate networking management based on the cost approach. Finansy i upravlenie / Finance and Management, no. 4, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7802.2021.4.36627. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivashkovskaya I.V. (2012). Stakeholder approach to management focused on incremental value of the company. Korporativnye finansy / Corporate Finance, vol. 6, no. 1(21), pp. 14–23. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kogdenko V.G., Melnik M.V. (2018). Modern trends in business analysis: Studying the company’s ecosystem, reviewing the business model’s information content, evaluating growth opportunities. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika / Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 38–57. https://doi.org/10.24891/re.16.1.38. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makeeva Yu.V., Ivashkovskaya I.V., Ruzhanskaya L.S., Popov K.A. (2021). Relationship between regional socio-economic development and corporate ratings of Russian companies. Ekonomika regiona / Economy of Region, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 86–102. https://doi.org/10.17059/econ.reg.2021-1-7. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meteleva M.A. (2022). Designing entrepreneurial networks: Development of corporations network potential evaluation method for corporations operating in the Russian arctic. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka / The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, no. 3, pp. 19–35. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.3.2022.77.002. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ryabova L.A. (2017). Social license to operate for the resource extraction companies as a new instrument of municipal development. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka / The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, no. 4(55), pp. 34–49. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tkachenko I.N. (2021). Rethinking the stakeholder approach to corporate governance in the coronavirus crisis: From commitment declaration to applied models. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2–16. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-2-1. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tkachenko I.N., Zlygostev A.A. (2018). Assessing stakeholders’ contribution to enterprise value: The case of the Russian banking sector. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 40–52. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-4-5. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Phillips D., Garcia-Diaz A. (1984). Fundamentals of network analysis. Moscow: Mir. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Banerjee S., Homroy S., Slechten A. (2022). Stakeholder preference and strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 77, 102286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102286</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barry J.W., Campello M., Graham J.R., Ma Y. (2022). Corporate flexibility in a time of crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 144, issue 3, pp. 780–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boutilier R.G., Thomson I. (2011). Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. http://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burt R.S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 6, pp. 79–141.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cader J., Koneczna R., Smol M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility as a significant factor of competitive advantage – a case study of energy companies in Poland. Energy Reports, no. 8, pp. 7989–8001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen C.-C., Khan A., Hongsuchon T., Ruangkanjanases A., Chen Y.-T., Sivarak O., Chen S.-C. (2021). The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate image in times of crisis: The mediating role of customer trust. InternationalJournal Environmental Research Public Health, no. 18, 8275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18168275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Darendeli A., Fiechter P., Hitz J.-M., Lehmann N. (2022). The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage. Journal of Accounting and Economics, no. 74, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101525</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eerola T.T. (2021). New low-impact mineral exploration technologies and the social license to explore: Insights from corporate websites in Finland. Cleaner Environmental Systems, no. 3, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Firmansyah A., Arham A., Qadri R.A., Wibowo P., Irawan F., Kustiani N.A., Wijaya S., Andriani A.F., Arfiansyah Z., Kurniawati L., Mabrur A., Dinarjito A., Kusumawati R., Mahrus M.L. (2022). Political connections, investment opportunity sets, tax avoidance: Does corporate social responsibility disclosure in Indonesia have a role? Heliyon, no. 8, e10155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freeman R.E. (2001). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie, vol. 3, 144. https://academic.udayton.edu</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gilsbach L., Schütte P., Franken G. (2022). Water reporting in mining: Are corporates losing sight of stakeholder interests? Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 345, 131016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Holmberg S.R., Cummings J.L. (2009). Building successful strategic alliances. Strategic process and analytical tool for selecting partner industries and firms. Long Range Planning, no. 42, pp. 164–193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibáñez-Forés V., Martínez-Sánchez V., Valls-Val K., Bovea M.D. (2023). How do organisations communicate aspects related to their social performance? A proposed set of indicators and metrics for sustainability reporting. Sustainable Production and Consumption, no. 35, pp. 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee W.J., Choi S.U. (2021). Internal and external corporate social responsibility activities and firm value: Evidence from the shared growth in the supply chain. Borsa Istanbul Review, no. 21-S1, S57eS69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matsutani L., Rampasso I.S., Serafim M.P., Quelhas O.L.G., Filhoe W.L., Anholon R. (2022). Critical analysis of corporate social responsibility projects developed by Brazilian companies: Providing new insights for debates. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, no. 7, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref63"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mulder C., Perrelli R., Rocha M. (2002). The role of corporate, legal and macroeconomic balance sheet indicators in crisis detection and prevention. IMF Working Paper. International Monetary Fund.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref64"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Newman M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 167–256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref65"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Paunović B. (2012). The role of corporate entrepreneurship in solving the competitiveness crisis of large companies. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 60, issuse 7-8, pp. 343–354. DOI: 10.5937/ecopre1208343p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref66"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pfajfar G., Shoham A., Małecka A., Zalaznik M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, no. 143, pp. 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref67"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popkova E., DeLo P., Sergic B.S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility amid social distancing during the COVID-19 crisis: BRICS vs. OECD countries. Research in International Business and Finance, no. 55, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref68"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prasad M., Mishra T., Bapat V. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Evidence from India using energy intensity as an indicator of environmental sustainability. IIMB Management Review, no. 31, pp. 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref69"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sergeeva N., Kapetanaki E. (2022). Corporate social responsibility as a strategic narrative: The cases of UK project-based organizations. Project Leadership and Society, no. 3, 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref70"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spaniol M.J., Rowland N.J. (2022). Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region Matthew. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change, no. 184, 121966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121966</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref71"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stout L.A. (2005). On the nature of corporations. Cornell Law Faculty Publications Paper, no. 1, pp. 252–268. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/717</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref72"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tkachenko I.N., Pervukhina I.V., Zlygostev A.A. (2020). Modeling the contribution and benefits of company stakeholders. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2–15. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-2-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref73"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tseng T.-Y. (2022). Influences of Taiwan’s corporate social responsibility report management policy on the information transparency of its capital market. Borsa Istanbul Review, no. 22-3, 487e497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref74"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zakharia Z., Menashy F. (2020). The emerging role of corporate actors as policymakers in education in emergencies: Evidence from the Syria refugee crisis. Journal on Education in Emergencies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 40–70. https://inee.org/evidence/journal</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
