<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленец</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2218-5003</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2686-7923</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-4-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">FTERIP</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="uri">https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2024/1656</article-id><self-uri>https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2024/1656</self-uri><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Нейросетевая классификация проектов технологического развития российских компаний: перспективы экстремального управления</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Neural network classification of technological development projects in Russian companies: Perspectives of extreme project management</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Михненко</surname><given-names>Павел Александрович</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Михненко</surname><given-names>Павел Александрович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mikhnenko</surname><given-names>Pavel A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>pmihnenko@bmstu.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Bauman University (Moscow, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный технический университет имени Н.Э. Баумана (Москва, РФ)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2024-09-06"><day>06</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>16</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-04-05"><day>05</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-07-18"><day>18</day><month>07</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY-NC 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Для достижения целей устойчивого социально-экономического развития и обеспечения технологического суверенитета Российской Федерации критически важен выбор методов эффективного управления технологическими проектами. Статья посвящена разработке нового инструментария нейросетевой классификации проектов технологического развития российских компаний и обоснованию актуальности применения методологии экстремального управления такими проектами. Методологическую базу исследования составили концепции управления жизненным циклом проекта и интеллектуального анализа данных. Методы исследования - интеллектуальный анализ текстов проектной документации с применением большой языковой модели, интеллектуальная классификация проектов на основе двумерной проекции многомерных кластеров с использованием Orange Data Mining. Информационной базой послужили нормативные документы в сфере научно-технологического развития Российской Федерации, открытые базы данных о проектах российских компаний. В работе разработан новый инструментарий нейросетевой классификации, основанный на большой языковой модели. Показано, что большинство проектов развития критических и сквозных технологий характеризуются низкой определенностью целей и решений, поэтому необходимо применять экстремальный подход к их управлению. Полученные результаты могут использоваться российскими компаниями для обоснования выбора модели управления проектами, а также экспертами-практиками при оценке проектов технологического развития.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>To achieve the goals of sustainable socio-economic development and ensure the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation, it is critically important to choose effective methods of technological project management. The article develops a novel toolkit for neural network classification of technological development projects in Russian companies and justifies the use of extreme project management to such endeavors. The methodological framework resides in the concepts of project lifecycle management and data mining. The study employed the following research methods: textual analysis of project documentation using large language models, and intelligent project classification based on two-dimensional projection of multidimensional clusters using Orange Data Mining. The research draws upon regulatory documents in the field of Russia’s scientific and technological development and open databases on Russian companies’ projects. The work proposes a new neural network classification toolkit based on a large language model. We have found that most development projects related to critical and end-to-end technologies are characterized by low certainty of goals and solutions, which necessitates applying extreme approaches to manage them. The findings can be used by Russian companies for reasoning the choice of a project management model, as well as by experts when evaluating technological development projects.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>управление технологическими проектами</kwd><kwd>экстремальное управление</kwd><kwd>технологическое развитие</kwd><kwd>интеллектуальный анализ</kwd><kwd>большая языковая модель</kwd><kwd>нейросетевая классификация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>technological project management</kwd><kwd>extreme management</kwd><kwd>technological development</kwd><kwd>intelligent analysis</kwd><kwd>large language model</kwd><kwd>neural network classification</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аганбегян А.Г. (2023). Перспективы инновационного развития России (Часть I) // Российское конкурентное право и экономика. № 1(33). С. 8-21. https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2023-1-33-8-21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бек К. (2022). Экстремальное программирование: разработка через тестирование. Санкт-Петербург: Питер.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бушуев С.Д., Бушуев Д.А., Неизвестный С.И. (2020). Конвергенция и гибридизация методологий управления проектами // Scientific Journal of Astana IT University. № 2 (2). С. 86-101. https://doi.org/10.37943/AITU.2020.20.47.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вертакова Ю.В., Бабич Т.Н. (2021). Экономическое развитие в условиях технологической и социальной трансформации // Экономика и управление. № 27 (4). С. 248-261. http://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-4-248-261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Горлачева Е.Н., Гончарова Н.П., Михайлов Н.Э., Андрианов Г.Д. (2023). Разработка инструментария мониторинга научно-технологических проектов // Наукоемкие технологии. № 24 (1). С. 55-64. https://doi.org/10.18127/j19998465-202301-06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дзензелюк Н.С., Новосад В.М. (2022). Оценка уровней готовности как инструмент управления технологическими проектами: задачи, проблемы и особенности применения для проектов НОЦ // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия "Экономика и менеджмент". № 16 (3). С. 153-164. https://doi.org/10.14529/em220317</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Евсеева М.В., Стариков Е.Н., Воронов М.П. (2021). Уровень технологического развития индустриальных регионов: экосистемный подход // Управленец. № 12 (3). С. 13-30. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-3-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Емельянова Е.Е., Лапочкина В.В, Шкилев И.Л. (2022). Позиция России в мире по уровню научно-технологического развития // Экономическая политика. № 17 (1). С. 64-101. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-1-64-101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Комаров А.В., Комаров К.А., Шуртаков К.В. (2021). Использование методологии комплексной оценки научно-технологических проектов для оценки рисков их невыполнения // Экономика науки. № 7 (1). С. 19-38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-1-19-38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Комаров А.В., Пихтарь А.Н., Гриневский И.В., Комаров К.А., Голицын Л.В. (2021). Концептуальная модель оценки технологической готовности научно-исследовательского проекта и его потенциала на ранних стадиях разработки // Экономика науки. № 7 (2). С. 111-134. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-2-111-134</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Константинов И.Б., Константинова Е.П. (2022). Технологический суверенитет как стратегия будущего развития российской экономики // Вестник Поволжского института управления. № 22 (5). С. 12-22. https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2022-5-12-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ленчук Е.Б. (2022). Научно-технологическое развитие России в условиях санкционного давления // Экономическое возрождение России. № 3 (73). С. 52-60. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-52-60</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ленчук Е.Б. (2023). Стратегическое планирование: новые вызовы в контексте внешних ограничений // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 4 (61). С. 224-230. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_224-230</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ленчук Е.Б., Филатов В.И. (2023). Стратегическое планирование как инструмент снижения неопределенности в условиях глобальной экономической трансформации // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. № 4. С. 7-24. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_7_24</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михненко П.А. (2023). Профессиональная коммуникация с генеративным искусственным интеллектом: тенденция или "мимолётное явление"? // Цифровая экономика. № 4 (25). С. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.34706/DE-2023-04-01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Наумов И.В., Красных С.С. (2023). Пространственное моделирование влияния научно-исследовательского потенциала на динамику научно-технологического развития регионов России // Journal of Applied Economic Research. № 22 (3). С. 630-656. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.3.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Первухин Д.В., Исаев Е.А., Рытиков Г.О., Филюгина Е.К., Айрапетян Д.А. (2020). Сравнительный анализ теоретических моделей каскадных, итеративных и гибридных подходов к управлению жизненным циклом ИТ-проекта // Бизнес-информатика. № 14 (1). С. 32-40. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-814X.2020.1.32.40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alexander J., Chase J., Newman N., Porter A., Roessner J. (2012). Emergence as a conceptual framework for understanding scientific and technological progress. In: 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies. Pp. 1286-1292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooper R.G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cozzens S.E., Gatchair S., Kang J., Kim K.-S., Lee H.J., Ordóñez G., Porter A. (2010). Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis &amp; Strategic Management, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 361-376.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeCarlo D. (2004). eXtreme project management: Using leadership, principles, and tools to deliver value in the face of volatility. 1st ed. Jossey-Bass.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giancarlo S., Marchesi M. (2001). Extreme programming examined. Boston: Addison-Wesley.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hair J.F., Anderson T.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamad R.M.H., Fayoumi M. (2018). Scalable agile transformation process (SATP) to convert waterfall project management office into Agile project management office. Proc. of the 19th Int. Arab Conf. on Information Technology (ACIT 2018). Lebanon, 28-30 November, 2018. Pp. 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hermann A., Gollhardt T., Cordes A.-K., von Lojewski L., Hartmann M.P., Becker J. (2024). Digital transformation in SMEs: A taxonomy of externally supported digital innovation projects. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 74, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102713</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kent B., Martin F. (2001). Planning extreme programming. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mankins J.C. (2009) Technology readiness and risk assessments: A new approach. Acta Astronautica, vol. 65, no. 9-10, pp. 1208-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peng X., Dai J., Smarandache F. (2023). Research on the assessment of project-driven immersion teaching in extreme programming with neutrosophic linguistic information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, no. 14, pp. 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-022-01669-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shawky D.M. (2014). Traditional vs Agile development: A comparison using chaos theory. Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Software Paradigm Trends (ICSOFT-PT 2014). Vienna, Austria, 29-31 August, 2014. Pp. 109-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thomsett R. (2002). Radical project management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Wickelmaier F. (2003). An introduction to MDS. Sound Quality Research Unit, Aalborg University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wysocki R.K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme. 7th ed. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aganbegyan A.G. (2023). Prospects for innovative development of Russia (Part I). Rossiyskoe konkurentnoe pravo i ekonomika / Russian Competition Law and Economy, no. 1(33), pp. 8–21. https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2023-1-33-8-21. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bek K. (2022). Extreme programming: Test driven development. Saint Petersburg: Piter. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bushuev S.D., Bushuev D.A., Neizvestnyy S.I. (2020). Convergence and hybridization of project management methodologies. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, no. 2(2), pp. 86–101. https://doi.org/10.37943/AITU.2020.20.47.008. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vertakova Yu.V., Babich T.N. (2021). Economic development in the context of technological and social transformations. Ekonomika i upravlenie / Economics and Management, no. 27(4), pp. 248–261. http://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-4-248-261. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gorlacheva E.N., Goncharova N.P., Mikhaylov N.E., Andrianov G.D. (2023). Development of tools for monitoring scientific and technological projects. Naukoemkie tekhnologii / Science Intensive Technologies, no. 24(1), pp. 55–64. https://doi. org/10.18127/j19998465-202301-06. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dzenzelyuk N.S., Novosad V.M. (2022). Assessing the readiness levels as a tool for management of technological projects: Objectives, problems and features of application for projects of research and education centers. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya Ekonomika i menedzhment / Bulletin of South Ural State University, Series “Economics and Management”, no. 16(3), pp. 153–164. https://doi.org/10.14529/em220317. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Evseeva M.V., Starikov E.N., Voronov M.P. (2021). Technological development of industrial regions: The ecosystem approach. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 13–30. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-3-2. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Emelyanova E.E., Lapochkina V.V, Shkilev I.L. (2022). Russia’s position in the world in terms of scientific and technological development. Ekonomicheskaya politika / Economic Policy, no. 17(1), pp. 64–101. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-1- 64-101. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Komarov A.V., Komarov K.A., Shurtakov K.V. (2021). Using the methodology for the comprehensive assessment of scientific and technological projects to estimate risks of their failure. Ekonomika nauki / Economics of Science, no. 7(1), pp. 19–38. https:// doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-1-19-38. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Komarov A.V., Pikhtar A.N., Grinevskiy I.V., Komarov K.A., Golitsyn L.V. (2021). A conceptual model for assessing the technological readiness of a R&amp;D project and its potential at the early stages of development. Ekonomika nauki / Economics of Science, no. 7(2), pp. 111–134. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-2-111-134. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konstantinov I.B., Konstantinova E.P. (2022). Technological sovereignty as a strategy for the future development of the Russian economy. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya / Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, no. 22(5), pp. 12–22. https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2022-5-12-22. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenchuk E.B. (2022). Scientific and technological development in Russia under sanctions pressure. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii / Economic Revival of Russia, no. 3(73), pp. 52–60. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-52-60. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenchuk E.B. (2023). Strategic planning: New challenges in the context of external constraints. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii / Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 4(61), pp. 224–230. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_224- 230. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenchuk E.B., Filatov V.I. (2023). Strategic planning as a tool for reducing uncertainty in conditions of global economic transformation. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk / Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 4, pp. 7–24. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_7_24. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikhnenko P.A. (2023). Professional communication with generative artificial intelligence: A trend or a “fleeting phenomenon”? Tsifrovaya ekonomika / Digital Economy, no. 4(25), pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.34706/DE-2023-04-01. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Naumov I.V., Krasnykh S.S. (2023). Spatial modelling of the impact of R&amp;D potential on the dynamics of scientific and technological development of Russian regions. Journal of Applied Economic Research, no. 22(3), pp. 630–656. https://doi.org/10.15826/ vestnik.2023.22.3.026. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pervukhin D.V., Isaev E.A., Rytikov G.O., Filyugina E.K., Ayrapetyan D.A. (2020). Theoretical comparative analysis of cascading, iterative, and hybrid approaches to IT project life cycle management. Biznes-informatika / Business Informatics, no. 14(1), pp. 32–40. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-814X.2020.1.32.40. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alexander J., Chase J., Newman N., Porter A., Roessner J. (2012). Emergence as a conceptual framework for understanding scientific and technological progress. In: 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies. Pp. 1286-1292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooper R.G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cozzens S.E., Gatchair S., Kang J., Kim K.-S., Lee H.J., Ordóñez G., Porter A. (2010). Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis &amp; Strategic Management, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 361-376.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeCarlo D. (2004). eXtreme project management: Using leadership, principles, and tools to deliver value in the face of volatility. 1st ed. Jossey-Bass.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giancarlo S., Marchesi M. (2001). Extreme programming examined. Boston: Addison-Wesley.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hair J.F., Anderson T.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamad R.M.H., Fayoumi M. (2018). Scalable agile transformation process (SATP) to convert waterfall project management office into Agile project management office. Proc. of the 19th Int. Arab Conf. on Information Technology (ACIT 2018). Lebanon, 28-30 November, 2018. Pp. 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hermann A., Gollhardt T., Cordes A.-K., von Lojewski L., Hartmann M.P., Becker J. (2024). Digital transformation in SMEs: A taxonomy of externally supported digital innovation projects. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 74, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102713</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kent B., Martin F. (2001). Planning extreme programming. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mankins J.C. (2009) Technology readiness and risk assessments: A new approach. Acta Astronautica, vol. 65, no. 9-10, pp. 1208-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peng X., Dai J., Smarandache F. (2023). Research on the assessment of project-driven immersion teaching in extreme programming with neutrosophic linguistic information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, no. 14, pp. 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-022-01669-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shawky D.M. (2014). Traditional vs Agile development: A comparison using chaos theory. Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Software Paradigm Trends (ICSOFT-PT 2014). Vienna, Austria, 29-31 August, 2014. Pp. 109-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thomsett R. (2002). Radical project management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Wickelmaier F. (2003). An introduction to MDS. Sound Quality Research Unit, Aalborg University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wysocki R.K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme. 7th ed. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
