<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленец</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2218-5003</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2686-7923</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-5-4</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">GXKFBA</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="uri">https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2024/1709</article-id><self-uri>https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2024/1709</self-uri><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Обеспечение результативности внешних корпоративных коммуникаций: неформальная классификация аудитории</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ensuring the performance of external communications: An informal classification of target groups</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Родченков</surname><given-names>Михаил Викторович</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Родченков</surname><given-names>Михаил Викторович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rodchenkov</surname><given-names>Mikhail V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>m.rodchenkov@gmail.com</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Higher School of Management (CQE) (Moscow, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Высшая школа управления (ЦКО) (г. Москва, РФ)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2024-11-06"><day>06</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>56</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-05-28"><day>28</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-09-08"><day>08</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY-NC 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Значимое влияние развивающегося инвестиционного сообщества на устойчивость бизнеса требует ясного понимания и верного сегментирования этой аудитории. Исследование направлено на выявление устойчивых критериев внутригрупповой дифференциации оценок и восприятия качественных характеристик финансовой отчетности представителями различных функциональных групп ее пользователей для повышения результативности управления внешними коммуникациями. Методологической основой работы послужила теория стейкхолдеров. Применены методы экспертных оценок, структурно-логического и многомерного дискриминантного анализа. Информационную базу составили аутентичные данные опроса 52 представителей российской бизнес-среды о качестве корпоративной отчетной информации, проведенного в IV квартале 2020 г. В результате исследования установлены имеющие мотивационную природу статистически значимые расхождения вероятности соотнесения части участников опроса со своей функциональной группой, сформированной по формальному признаку. Определены актуальные критерии неформального деления респондентов по группам, базирующиеся на оценочных суждениях о качественных характеристиках корпоративной финансовой отчетности, включающие различия в оценках сложности стандартов отчетности и функциональности стоимостных показателей на основе концепции справедливой рыночной стоимости. Выявление критериев мотивационно-функциональной идентификации устойчивых подгрупп пользователей финансовой отчетности, образованных внутри функциональных групп, определяет научную новизну работы. Итоги исследования вносят вклад в понимание актуальных критериев групповой структуры инвестиционного сообщества как целевой аудитории корпоративной отчетности и могут использоваться для уточнения формальной функциональной классификации пользователей отчетной информации и корректировки других элементов корпоративных систем управления с целью повышения эффективности внешних коммуникаций.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The increasing influence of the investment community on business sustainability highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding and accurate segmentation of this audience. The research aims to identify consistent criteria for intragroup differentiation in the perception of financial reporting information among members of various stakeholder groups in order to improve the performance of external communications management. Methodologically, the study rests upon stakeholder theory, which is supported by expert assessments, structural-logical analysis, and multidimensional discriminant analysis. The study draws on authentic data of a survey on the quality of corporate reporting information conducted in the fourth quarter of 2020 among 52 representatives of the Russian business. The research identifies motivationally-rooted statistically significant discrepancies in the probability of correlating some survey participants with their functional group formed on a formal basis. We discuss the relevant criteria for an informal division of respondents into groups based on subjective judgments about qualitative characteristics of corporate financial reports. These criteria include variations in estimates of complexity of reporting standards and functionality of cost indicators based on the concept of fair market value. The revealed criteria for motivational and functional identification within stable subgroups of financial statement users formed within functional groups represents the scientific novelty of this study. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the relevant criteria for the group structure of the investment community, which constitutes the target audience for corporate reporting. These findings can be utilized to refine the formal classification of users of reporting information, as well as to adjust other components of corporate management systems with the aim of enhancing the effectiveness of external communications.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>IR-менеджмент;</kwd><kwd>внешние коммуникации;</kwd><kwd>неформальная классификация;</kwd><kwd>мотивационно-функциональная идентификация;</kwd><kwd>отчетная информация;</kwd><kwd>дискриминантный анализ;</kwd><kwd>МСФО.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>investor relations (IR) management;</kwd><kwd>external communications;</kwd><kwd>informal classification;</kwd><kwd>motivational and functional identification;</kwd><kwd>reporting information;</kwd><kwd>discriminant analysis;</kwd><kwd>IFRS.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Буздалин А. (2010). Организация отношений с инвесторами: российская и зарубежная практика. Москва: Альпина Паблишер.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Волкова О.Н. (2017). Отношения с инвесторами (investor relations): международный контекст, российская практика // Корпоративные финансы. Т.12, № 2. С. 65–76. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.11.2.2017.81-95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ивашковская И.В. (2024). Моделирование стоимости компании. Стратегическая ответственность советов директоров. Москва: ИНФРА-М.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ивашковская И.В. (2019). Финансовые измерения корпоративных стратегий. Стейкхолдерский подход. Москва: ИНФРА-М.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ивашковская И.В. (2012). Стейкхолдерский подход к управлению, ориентированному на приращение стоимости компании // Корпоративные финансы. Т. 1, № 21. С. 14–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кирпищиков Д.А. (2024). Социальный капитал совета директоров как фактор устойчивости компаний к экзогенным шокам // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 1 (62). С. 50–74. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_1_50-74</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ковалев В.В., Ковалев Вит.В. (2019). Корпоративные финансы и учет. Москва: Проспект.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Котлер Ф. (1991). Основы маркетинга. Москва: Прогресс.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Купряшин Г.Л. (2023). О робастности системы государственного управления в турбулентной среде // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 4 (61). С. 236–241. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_236-241</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мескон М.Х., Альберт М., Хедоури Ф. (2016). Основы менеджмента: пер. с англ. Москва: Вильямс.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Позина М.Б., Ханова З.Г. (2020). Исследовательские горизонты изучения психологии российского предпринимательства // Современная конкуренция. Т. 14, № 2 (78). С. 26–35. https://doi.org/10.37791/1993-7598-2020-14-2-26-35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Е.В. (2023). Экосистемы фирм: формирование исследовательской программы // Управленец. Т. 14, № 1. С. 2–15. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-1-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Прохорова И.С., Рассказова А.Ю. (2020). Анализ взаимодействия с заинтересованными сторонами предприятия: практика применения стандарта АА1000SES на примере Национального аэрозольного кластера // Вестник ГУУ. № 11. С. 96–104. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-11-96-104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Родченков М.В. (2021). Методологические аспекты конвергенции национальных учетных систем под влиянием МСФО // Аудит и финансовый анализ. № 1. С. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.38097/AFA.2021.89.23.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Родченков М.В., Суйц В.П. (2021). Проблемы и специфика конвергенции национальных учетных систем под влиянием МСФО // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6. Экономика. № 4. С. 29–48. https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Руднев Е.А. (2023). Организационная культура российских компаний в условиях социально-экономических изменений // Российский журнал менеджмента. Т. 21, № 4. С. 600–618. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2023.407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скобелев В.Л. (2021). Концепция методологии управления стейкхолдерами компании // Петербургский экономический журнал. № 3. С. 66–73. https://doi.org/10.24412/2307-5368-2021-3-66-73</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Слепенкова Е.М. Горчаков К.А. (2009). Построение комплекса интегрированных маркетинговых коммуникаций в российской компании // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6. Экономика. № 5. С. 64–73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Суйц В.П., Хорин А.Н., Шеремет А.Д. (2023). Комплексный анализ и аудит интегрированной отчетности по устойчивому развитию компаний. Москва: Инфра-М.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Телегин О.В. (2022). Регулярные коммуникации Банка России и краткосрочные эффекты волатильности на финансовых рынках // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 2 (54). С. 130–155. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022- 54-2-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Теплова Т.В., Соколова Т.В., Томтосов А.Ф., Бучко Д.В., Никулин Д.Д. (2022). Сентимент частных инвесторов в объяснении различий в биржевых характеристиках акций российского рынка // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 1 (53). С. 53–84. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ткаченко И.Н. (2021). Актуализация стейкхолдерского подхода корпоративного управления в условиях коронакризиса: от декларирования приверженности к прикладным моделям // Управленец. Т. 12, № 2. С. 2–16. https://doi. org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-2-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цой М.Е., Щеколдин В.Ю. (2023). Сегментация потребителей промышленного оборудования на основе MRFM-анализа // Управленец. Т. 14, № 2. С. 90–99. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-2-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шилова В.А., Угринович Д.А. (2018). Классификации коммуникативных стратегий в процессе реализации управленческих решений // СНиСП. Т. 24, № 4. С. 84–94. https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2018.6.4.6086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Щербаченко П.С. (2018). Управление взаимодействием со стейкхолдерами в российских компаниях // Вестник ГУУ. № 5. С. 155–161. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-5-155-161</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Agoglia C., Doupnik T., Tsakumis G. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 747–767. https://doi. org/10.2308/accr.00000045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ashbaugh H., Pincus M. (2001). Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 417–434.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brennan N.M., Merkl-Davies D.M. (2018). Do firms effectively communicate with financial stakeholders? A conceptual model of corporate communication in a capital market context. Accounting and Business Research, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00014788.2018.1470143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bunge J.A., Judson D.H. (2005). Data mining. In: K. Kempf-Leonard. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of social measurement. 1–3 [Mixed media product]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carlsson‐Wall M., Kaarboe K., Kraus K., Meidell A. (2020). Risk management as passionate imitation: The interconnections among emotions, performance metrics, and risk in a global technology firm. Abacus, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castro‐Martinez M.P., Jackson P.R. (2017). Translation of trustworthiness signals into factors for stakeholder value cocreation. Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 18, e1685. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1685</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen L.P. (2022). Network-based discriminant analysis for multiclassification. Journal of Classification, vol. 39, pp. 410–431. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00357-022-09414-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clarkson M.A. (1994). Risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance &amp; Ethics, University of Toronto.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen J.R., Hoitash U., Krishnamoorthy G., Wright A. (2014). The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. Accounting Review, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 243–273. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1567453</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cutlip S.M, Center A.H., Broom G.M. (2006). Effective public relations. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dechow P., Sloan R., Zha J. (2014). Stock prices and earnings: A history of research. Annual Review of Financial Economics, vol. 6, pp. 343–363. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2347193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Donatella P. (2021). Further evidence on the relationship between audit industry specialization and public sector audit quality. Financial Accountability &amp; Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Farooque O. (2016). Sustainable financial reporting practice in Australian companies – Does quality matter? Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Freeman R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gassen J., Schwedler K. (2010). The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: Evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 495–509. https://doi. org/10.1080/09638180.2010.496548</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gigler F., Kanodia C., Sapra H., Venugopalan R. (2014). How frequent financial reporting can cause managerial short-termism: An analysis of the costs and benefits of increasing reporting frequency. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 357–387. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196152</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gijbels I., Hubert M. (2010). Robust and nonparametric statistical methods. In: S. Brown, R. Tauler, B. Walczak. (Eds.). Comprehensive chemometrics (pp. 189–211). 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hope O. (2003). Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts' forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 235–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huseynli N., Kandemir G., Huseynli B. (2023). Analysis of consumer behavior variables influencing the adoption of mobile banking. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 60–73. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-1-5. EDN: YZGDDD.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kadous K., Mercer M. (2012). Can reporting norms create a safe harbor? Jury verdicts against auditors under precise and imprecise accounting standards. Accounting Review, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 565–587. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laskin A. (2011). How investor relations contribute to the corporate bottom line. Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.582206</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lavine B.K., Rayens W.S. (2009). Classification: Basic concepts. In: S. Brown, R. Tauler, B. Walczak. (Eds.). Comprehensive chemometrics (pp. 507–515). 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee M. (2019). Introduction: Bubbles and machines. In: Bubbles and machines: Gender, information and financial crises (pp. 1–28). London: University of Westminster Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lev B. (2018). The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liang L., Riedl E. (2014). The effect of fair value versus historical cost reporting model on analyst forecast accuracy. Accounting Review, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50687</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu X. (2016). Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) models. In: Methods and applications of longitudinal data analysis (pp. 281–308). San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sidney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McDaniel L., Martin R., Maines L. (2002). Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. Accounting Review, vol. 77 (s-1), pp. 139–167. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meloun M., Militký J. (2011). Statistical data analysis: A practical guide. New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing India.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michailova S., Worm V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and guanxi. European Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00077-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 853–888. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Muravyev A. (2017). Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects. Economic Systems, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ramalingegowda S., Wang C., Yu Y. (2013). The role of financial reporting quality in mitigating the constraining effect of dividend policy on investment decisions. Accounting Review, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1007–1039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Riffenburgh R.H. (2012). Statistics in medicine. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schoenfeld J. (2020). Contracts between firms and shareholders. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 383–427. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046182</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sinharay S. (2010). An overview of statistics in education. In: P. Peterson et al. (Eds.). International encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–11). 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tantalo C., Priem R.L. (2014). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 2. https:// doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wu R., Hao N. (2022). Quadratic discriminant analysis by projection. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 190, 104987. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2022.104987</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref63"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zavertiaeva M.A., López-Iturriaga F.J. (2020). Networks of directors on Russian boards: The hidden part of the corporate governance iceberg. Russian Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–50. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref64"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buzdalin A. (2010). Organizing investor relations: Russian and foreign practice. Moscow: Alpina Publisher. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref65"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volkova O.N. (2017). Investor relations: International context, Russian practice. Korporativnye finansy / Journal of Corporate Finance Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 65–76. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.11.2.2017.81-95. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref66"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivashkovskaya I.V. (2024). Modeling company value. Strategic responsibility of boards of directors. Moscow: INFRA-M. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref67"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivashkovskaya I.V. (2019). Financial dimensions of corporate strategies. Stakeholder approach. Moscow: INFRA-M. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref68"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivashkovskaya I.V. (2012). Stakeholder approach to management focused on increasing the company’s value. Korporativnye finansy / Journal of Corporate Finance Research, vol. 1, no. 21, pp. 14–23. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref69"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirpishchikov D.A. (2024). Board of directors’ social capital as factor of companies’ resilience to exogenous shocks. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii / Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 1(62), pp. 50–74. https://doi. org/10.31737/22212264_2024_1_50-74. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref70"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kovalev V.V., Kovalev Vit.V. (2019). Corporate finance and accounting. Moscow: Prospekt. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref71"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kotler F. (1991). Fundamentals of marketing. Moscow: Progress. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref72"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kupryashin G.L. (2023). On the public governance robustness in turbulent times. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii / Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 4(61), pp. 236–241. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_236-241. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref73"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meskon M.Kh., Albert M., Khedouri F. (2016). Fundamentals of management. Moscow: Vilyams. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref74"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pozina M.B., Khanova Z.G. (2020). Research horizons of studying the psychology of Russian entrepreneurship. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya / Modern Competition, vol. 14, no. 2(78), pp. 26–35. https://doi.org/10.37791/1993-7598-2020-14-2-26-35. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref75"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E.V. (2023). Firms’ ecosystems: Developing a research programme. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2–15. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-1-1. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref76"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prokhorova I.S., Rasskazova A.Yu. (2020). Analysis of interaction with stakeholders of the enterprise: The practice of applying the standard АА1000SES on the example of the national aerosol cluster. Vestnik Universiteta, no. 11, pp. 96–104. https://doi. org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-11-96-104. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref77"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodchenkov M.V. (2021). Methodological aspects of the convergence of national accounting systems under the influence of IFRS. Audit i finansovyy analiz / Audit and Financial Analysis, no. 1, pp. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.38097/AFA.2021.89.23.006. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref78"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodchenkov M.V., Suyts V.P. (2021). Problems and specifics of national accounting systems convergence under the influence of IFRS. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika / Moscow University Economics Bulletin, no. 4, pp. 29–48. https:// doi.org/10.38050/01300105202142. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref79"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rudnev E.A. (2023). Organizational culture of Russian companies within socio-economic changes. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta / Russian Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 600–618. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2023.407. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref80"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skobelev V.L. (2021). The concept of a company’s stakeholder management methodology. Peterburgskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal / Petersburg Economic Journal, no. 3, pp. 66–73. https://doi.org/10.24412/2307-5368-2021-3-66-73. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref81"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Slepenkova E.M. Gorchakov K.A. (2009). Building a complex of integrated marketing communications in a Russian company. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika / Moscow University Economics Bulletin, no. 5, no. 64–73. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref82"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suyts V.P., Khorin A.N., Sheremet A.D. (2023). Comprehensive analysis and audit of integrated reporting on the sustainable development of companies. Moscow: Infra-M. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref83"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Telegin O.V. (2022). Bank of Russia regular communications and volatility short-term effects in financial markets. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii / Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 2(54), pp. 130–155. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221- 2264-2022-54-2-7. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref84"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teplova T.V., Sokolova T.V., Tomtosov A.F., Buchko D.V., Nikulin D.D. (2022). The sentiment of private investors in explaining the differences in the trade characteristics of the Russian market stocks. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii / Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 1(53), pp. 53–84. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-3. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref85"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tkachenko I.N. (2021). Rethinking the stakeholder approach to corporate governance in the coronavirus crisis: From commitment declaration to applied models. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2–16. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218- 5003-2021-12-2-1. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref86"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsoy M.E., Shchekoldin V.Yu. (2023). MRFM-analysis for customer segmentation in the industrial equipment market. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 90–99. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-2-7. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref87"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shilova V.A., Ugrinovich D.A. (2018). Classification of communicative strategies in the implementation of management decisions. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika / Sociology of Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 84–94. https://doi.org/10.19181/ snsp.2018.6.4.6086. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref88"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shcherbachenko P.S. (2018). Management of interaction with stakeholders in Russian companies. Vestnik Universiteta, no. 5, pp. 155–161. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-5-155-161. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref89"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agoglia C., Doupnik T., Tsakumis G. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 747–767. https://doi. org/10.2308/accr.00000045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref90"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ashbaugh H., Pincus M. (2001). Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 417–434.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref91"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brennan N.M., Merkl-Davies D.M. (2018). Do firms effectively communicate with financial stakeholders? A conceptual model of corporate communication in a capital market context. Accounting and Business Research, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00014788.2018.1470143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref92"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bunge J.A., Judson D.H. (2005). Data mining. In: K. Kempf-Leonard. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of social measurement. 1–3 [Mixed media product]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref93"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carlsson‐Wall M., Kaarboe K., Kraus K., Meidell A. (2020). Risk management as passionate imitation: The interconnections among emotions, performance metrics, and risk in a global technology firm. Abacus, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref94"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Castro‐Martinez M.P., Jackson P.R. (2017). Translation of trustworthiness signals into factors for stakeholder value cocreation. Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 18, e1685. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1685</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref95"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen L.P. (2022). Network-based discriminant analysis for multiclassification. Journal of Classification, vol. 39, pp. 410–431. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00357-022-09414-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref96"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clarkson M.A. (1994). Risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance &amp; Ethics, University of Toronto.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref97"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen J.R., Hoitash U., Krishnamoorthy G., Wright A. (2014). The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. Accounting Review, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 243–273. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1567453</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref98"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cutlip S.M, Center A.H., Broom G.M. (2006). Effective public relations. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref99"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dechow P., Sloan R., Zha J. (2014). Stock prices and earnings: A history of research. Annual Review of Financial Economics, vol. 6, pp. 343–363. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2347193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref100"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Donatella P. (2021). Further evidence on the relationship between audit industry specialization and public sector audit quality. Financial Accountability &amp; Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref101"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Farooque O. (2016). Sustainable financial reporting practice in Australian companies – Does quality matter? Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref102"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freeman R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref103"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gassen J., Schwedler K. (2010). The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: Evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 495–509. https://doi. org/10.1080/09638180.2010.496548</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref104"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gigler F., Kanodia C., Sapra H., Venugopalan R. (2014). How frequent financial reporting can cause managerial short-termism: An analysis of the costs and benefits of increasing reporting frequency. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 357–387. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196152</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref105"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gijbels I., Hubert M. (2010). Robust and nonparametric statistical methods. In: S. Brown, R. Tauler, B. Walczak. (Eds.). Comprehensive chemometrics (pp. 189–211). 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref106"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hope O. (2003). Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts' forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 235–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref107"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huseynli N., Kandemir G., Huseynli B. (2023). Analysis of consumer behavior variables influencing the adoption of mobile banking. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 60–73. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-1-5. EDN: YZGDDD.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref108"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kadous K., Mercer M. (2012). Can reporting norms create a safe harbor? Jury verdicts against auditors under precise and imprecise accounting standards. Accounting Review, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 565–587. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref109"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laskin A. (2011). How investor relations contribute to the corporate bottom line. Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.582206</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref110"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lavine B.K., Rayens W.S. (2009). Classification: Basic concepts. In: S. Brown, R. Tauler, B. Walczak. (Eds.). Comprehensive chemometrics (pp. 507–515). 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref111"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee M. (2019). Introduction: Bubbles and machines. In: Bubbles and machines: Gender, information and financial crises (pp. 1–28). London: University of Westminster Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref112"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lev B. (2018). The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref113"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liang L., Riedl E. (2014). The effect of fair value versus historical cost reporting model on analyst forecast accuracy. Accounting Review, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50687</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref114"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu X. (2016). Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) models. In: Methods and applications of longitudinal data analysis (pp. 281–308). San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sidney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref115"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McDaniel L., Martin R., Maines L. (2002). Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. Accounting Review, vol. 77 (s-1), pp. 139–167. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref116"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meloun M., Militký J. (2011). Statistical data analysis: A practical guide. New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing India.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref117"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michailova S., Worm V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and guanxi. European Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00077-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref118"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 853–888. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref119"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muravyev A. (2017). Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects. Economic Systems, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref120"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ramalingegowda S., Wang C., Yu Y. (2013). The role of financial reporting quality in mitigating the constraining effect of dividend policy on investment decisions. Accounting Review, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1007–1039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref121"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Riffenburgh R.H. (2012). Statistics in medicine. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref122"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schoenfeld J. (2020). Contracts between firms and shareholders. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 383–427. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046182</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref123"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sinharay S. (2010). An overview of statistics in education. In: P. Peterson et al. (Eds.). International encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–11). 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref124"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tantalo C., Priem R.L. (2014). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 2. https:// doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref125"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wu R., Hao N. (2022). Quadratic discriminant analysis by projection. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 190, 104987. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2022.104987</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref126"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zavertiaeva M.A., López-Iturriaga F.J. (2020). Networks of directors on Russian boards: The hidden part of the corporate governance iceberg. Russian Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–50. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.102</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list><ack xml:lang="ru"><p>Автор признателен Анушке Ферлигой (Anuška Ferligoj), Люблянскому университету (University of Ljubljana) и Международной лаборатории прикладных сетевых исследований НИУ ВШЭ за полезные комментарии; благодарен Виктору П. Суйцу и всем коллегам кафедры бухгалтерского учета, анализа и аудита Московского государственного университета им. М.В. Ломоносова за помощь в получении данных опроса и усовершенствовании методологии. Автор также выражает благодарность всем участникам опроса.</p></ack><ack xml:lang="en"><p>The author is grateful to Anuška Ferligoj, the University of Ljubljana and the International Laboratory for Applied Network Research NRU HSE for useful comments; to Viktor P. Suyts and all colleagues of the Department of Accounting, Analysis and Audit of Lomonosov Moscow State University for assistance in obtaining survey data and improving the methodology. The author also expresses gratitude to all survey participants.</p></ack></back></article>
