<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленец</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2218-5003</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2686-7923</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-6-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">JMBAZC</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="uri">https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2025/1765</article-id><self-uri>https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2025/1765</self-uri><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Почему идеология дирижизма имеет значение в российской экономической науке</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Why the ideology of dirigisme matters in Russian economic science</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Вольчик</surname><given-names>Вячеслав Витальевич</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Вольчик</surname><given-names>Вячеслав Витальевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Volchik</surname><given-names>Vyacheslav V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>volchik@sfedu.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Цыганков</surname><given-names>Сергей Сергеевич</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цыганков</surname><given-names>Сергей Сергеевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsygankov</surname><given-names>Sergey S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>sscygankov@sfedu.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Маскаев</surname><given-names>Артём Ильич</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Маскаев</surname><given-names>Артём Ильич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Maskaev</surname><given-names>Artem I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>maskaev@sfedu.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Южный федеральный университет (г. Ростов-на-Дону, РФ)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-16"><day>16</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-08-29"><day>29</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-10-31"><day>31</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY-NC 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Идеология является частью современной экономической науки, отражающей использование различных ментальных моделей и определяющей видение экономических процессов. Тем не менее дирижизм как экономическая идеология недостаточно исследован в научной литературе. Статья посвящена анализу положения идеологии дирижизма в российской экономической науке. Методологической базой послужил подход нарративной экономики, помогающий выявить теоретические нарративы, которые концентрируют внимание на взаимосвязи между событиями, фактами и их интерпретациями. Использованы количественный и качественный методы изучения текстов с применением машинного анализа: классификация с помощью векторных представлений (эмбеддингов); анализ релевантных n-грамм. Информационную базу исследования составили 40 045 научных русскоязычных статей по экономике за период с 1992 по 2023 г., отнесенных к идеологии дирижизма. Машинный анализ показал, что сегодня дирижизм является самой значимой идеологией в российской экономической науке. Анализ распространенных биграмм и триграмм позволил выделить три стадии развития дирижизма: раннюю, промежуточную и современную, а также сформулировать три его теоретических нарратива: «дирижизм и технократия», «дирижизм или вечное отставание (догоняющее развитие)» и «управляемость экономики». Показано, что элементы дирижизма формализованы в виде стратегического и индикативного планирования в рамках Федерального закона «О стратегическом планировании в Российской Федерации» и связанных с ним подзаконных актов. Результаты исследования углубляют научное понимание экономической идеологии дирижизма и могут быть использованы для анализа государственной экономической политики в России.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Ideology is an integral part of modern economics that reflects the use of appropriate mental models and shapes the vision of economic processes. However, existing academic literature lacks analysis of dirigisme as an economic ideology. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the position of dirigisme in Russian economic science. Methodologically, the research rests on the narrative economics approach that facilitates the identification of concise theoretical narratives focusing on the relationships between events, facts, and their interpretations. The authors applied the methods of quantitative and qualitative text analysis through machine learning: classification using vector representations (embeddings), and analysis of relevant n-grams. Empirical data cover a corpus of 40,045 Russian-language scientific articles on economics published between 1992 and 2023 that are attributed to the ideology of dirigisme. According to machine analysis, dirigisme is the most prominent ideology in contemporary Russian economics. Having considered the most common bigrams and trigrams, we identified three stages – early, intermediate, and modern – in the development of this ideology in Russian economics. The paper also formulates three its theoretical narratives: “dirigisme and technocracy”, “dirigisme and eternal lag (catching-up)”, and “manageability of economy”. The findings demonstrate that dirigisme’s elements are formalized through strategic and indicative planning in the Federal Law “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation” and related bylaws. The research results contribute to a better understanding of dirigisme as an economic ideology and can be used to analyze public economic policy in Russia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экономическая идеология;</kwd><kwd>дирижизм;</kwd><kwd>теоретический нарратив;</kwd><kwd>экономическая наука;</kwd><kwd>нарративная экономика.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>economic ideology;</kwd><kwd>dirigisme;</kwd><kwd>theoretical narrative;</kwd><kwd>economics;</kwd><kwd>narrative economics.</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 24-18-00665 «Идеологический ландшафт российской экономической науки» (https://rscf.ru/project/24-18-00665/) в Южном федеральном университете.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">This research was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 24-18-00665 “The ideological landscape of Russian economic science” (https://rscf.ru/project/24-18-00665/) at Southern Federal University</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Автономов В.С. (2024). Судьба «больших теорий» в экономической науке // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 1 (22). С. 96–105. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_1_96_105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бодрунов С.Д. (2016). О некоторых вопросах эволюции экономико-социального устройства индустриального общества новой генерации // Экономическое возрождение России. № 3 (49). С. 5–18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Борщевский Г.А. (2022). Современный дискурс гражданской службы России: взгляд сквозь призму административных парадигм // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. № 2. С. 34–59. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999- 5431-2022-0-2-34-59</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вебер М. (2016). Хозяйство и общество: очерки понимающей социологии. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Веблен Т.Б. (1984). Теория праздного класса. Москва: Прогресс.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Веблен Т.Б. (2018). Инженеры и ценовая система / пер. с англ. И. Кошкина. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В. (2020). Нарративы и понимание экономических институтов // Terra Economicus. Т. 18, № 2. С. 49–69. https:// doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-49-69</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В. (2022). К вопросу о теории и методологии нарративной экономики // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 3. С. 31–46. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_3_31_46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В. (2024). Идеология и нарративная экономика // Terra Economicus. Т. 22, № 3. С. 21–33. https://doi. org/10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-3-21-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В. (2025). Дрейф идеологий в российской экономической науке // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 17, № 2. С. 133–145. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2025.17.2.133-145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Маскаев А.И., Ширяев И.М., Цыганков С.С., Фурса Е.В., Кот В.В. (2024a). Дуалистичный и множественный подходы к исследованию идеологии в экономической науке // Journal of Economic Regulation. Т. 15, № 4. С. 16–30. https:// doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2024.15.4.016-030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Маслюкова Е.В., Марьян П.А., Скрябин М.В. (2024b). Эмпирическое исследование идеологической составляющей в российской экономической науке // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 16, № 4. С. 42–59. https://doi. org/10.17835/2076-6297.2024.16.4.042-059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Фурса Е.В. (2024а). Идеология и теоретические нарративы в экономической науке // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 4. С. 7–21. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_4_7_21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Фурса Е.В. (2024b). Теория и идеология в экономической науке: от Адама Смита до Эстер Дюфло // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6. Экономика. № 6. С. 161–186. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Фурса Е.В., Кот В.В., Цыганков С.С., Ширяев И.М., Маскаев А.И. (2023). Как обеспечить комплексное развитие российской инновационной системы // Journal of Economic Regulation. Т. 14, № 4. С. 6–17. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078- 5429.2023.14.4.006-017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Цыганков С.С., Маскаев А.И. (2022). Формальные институты российской инновационной системы в свете нарративной экономики // ЭКО. № 10 (580). С. 110–128. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-10-110-128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Цыганков С.С., Маскаев А.И. (2024). Политика нового менеджмента в государственном секторе как продолжение идеологии неолиберализма // Управленец. Т. 15, № 6. С. 2–16. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003 2024-15-6-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Цыганков С.С., Фурса Е.В., Ширяев И.М., Маскаев А.И. (2022). Институты и механизмы регулирования российской инновационной системы в зеркале нарративов // Journal of Economic Regulation. Т. 13, № 4. С. 6–23. https:// doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2022.13.4.006-023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гельман В.Я. (2017). Politics versus policy: технократические ловушки постсоветских реформ // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз. № 2 (85). С. 32–59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазьев С.Ю. (2018). Какая политика обеспечит опережающее развитие российской экономики? // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. № 2 (24). С. 12–16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазьев С.Ю. (2020). О создании систем стратегического планирования и управления научно-техническим развитием // Инновации. № 2 (256). С. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.26310/2071-3010.2020.256.2.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гэлбрейт Д.К. (2008). Новое индустриальное общество. Избранное. Москва: Эксмо. Евстигнеева Л.,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Евстигнеев Р. (1995). Управляемость экономикой в ходе реформ // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 11. С. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-1995-11-5-14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В.М. (2013). От машин удовольствия к моральным сообществам (размышления над новой книгой Джеффри Ходжсона) // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 5, № 2. С. 7–47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Журавлев О.М., Матвеев И.А. (2022). Государственный капитализм в России: состояние исследований (часть 2) // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. Т. 16, № 3. С. 47–57. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-03-47-57</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Заостровцев А.П. (2017). XVI Леонтьевские чтения: «Россия 1917–2017: европейская модернизация или особый путь?» // Экономическая политика. Т. 12, № 2. С. 208–217. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-2-09</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Капелюшников Р. (2022). Приключения «неолиберализма» // Логос. Т. 32, № 4 (149). С. 1–50. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869- 5377-2022-4-1-49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Капогузов Е.А. (2017). Роль кейнсианских идей в эволюции парадигм государственного управления // Историко-экономические исследования. Т. 18, № 2. С. 244–256. https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-2588.2017.18(2).244-256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клейнер Г.Б. (2022). Инклюзивный рост в экономике замкнутого цикла // Экономическое возрождение России. № 3 (73). С. 37–44. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-37-44</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Криничная Е.П. (2021). Детерминантные проблемы развития сельского хозяйства в России // Вестник аграрной науки. № 2 (89). С. 137–145. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2587-666X.2021.2.137</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузьбожев Э.Н., Рябцева И.Ф., Некрасова А.С. (2013). Государственная экономическая политика и индикативное планирование на предприятии // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. № 10 (313). С. 11–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Латов Ю.В. (2018). Развитие экономической теории как отражение конкуренции этатистской и либеральной идеологий // Экономическая теория: триумф или кризис?: материалы XVII Ежегодной междунар. конф. (Санкт-Петербург, 16–17 февраля 2018 г.). / под ред. А.П. Заостровцева. Санкт-Петербург: Международный центр социально-экономических исследований «Леонтьевский центр». С. 132–148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лёвкина А.О. (2017). Коннотации технократии в дискурсе о формах инновационного развития общества // Социум и власть. № 6 (68). С. 13–20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ленчук Е.Б., Филатов В.И. (2019). Стратегическое планирование как инструмент преодоления технологического отставания России // Мир новой экономики. Т. 13, № 2. С. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-2-32-42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ли Д.Д. (2025). Китайский взгляд на мир. Развенчание мифов о Китае для предотвращения глобального конфликта. Ереван: Fortis Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Макаров А.В. (2015). «Технократия инженеров» Т. Веблена как альтернативная концепция управления экономикой // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. № 3. С. 166–176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мау В.А. (2010). Долгосрочные вызовы развития России и научное наследие Е.Т. Гайдара // Экономическая политика. № 6. С. 5–11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мау В.А. (2025). Экономические реформы в СССР: последний акт (1985–1991 гг.). К 40-летию перестройки // Вопросы экономики. № 7. С. 49–81. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-7-49-81</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милейковский А.Г. (1971). Буржуазные экономические теории и экономическая политика империалистических стран. Москва: Мысль.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Покидченко М.Г. (2017). Экономическая политика России: историко-институциональные доминанты // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. № 3. С. 7–17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полтерович В.М. (2007). О стратегии догоняющего развития для России // Экономическая наука современной России. № 3 (38). С. 17–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полтерович В.М. (2016). Институты догоняющего развития (к проекту новой модели экономического развития России) // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. № 5 (47). С. 34–56. https://doi.org/10.15838/ esc/2016.5.47.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полтерович В.М. (2017). Разработка стратегий социально-экономического развития: наука vs идеология // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 1. С. 55–65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полтерович В.М., Попов В.В. (2005). Стимулирование роста и стадии развития // Модернизация экономики и выращивание институтов: материалы VI Междунар. науч. конф. (Москва, 5–7 апреля 2005 г.) / под ред. Е.Г. Ясина. Москва: ВШЭ. С. 137–149.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полушкина Т.М. (2020). Эффективность государственного регулирования сельского хозяйства // Фундаментальные исследования. № 6. С. 108–112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попова Е.В. (2008). Индикативное планирование как основной метод формирования долгосрочной социально-экономической стратегии России // Инновации. № 9 (119). С. 15–27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Радермахер В.Д. (2021). Статистика и управление: размышления о будущем официальной статистики в цифровом и глобализированном обществе // Вопросы статистики. Т. 28, № 4. С. 23–44. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-4- 23-44</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Радыгин А. (2008). Государственный капитализм и финансовый кризис: факторы взаимодействия, издержки и перспективы // Экономическая политика. № 6. С. 88–105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скрябин М.В., Марьян П.А., Вольчик В.В. (2025). Методика исследования теоретических нарративов при помощи компьютерного анализа текстов // Journal of Economic Regulation. Т. 16, № 3. С. 6–19. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078- 5429.2025.16.3.006-019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сочнева Е.Н., Шадрин В.К., Кравцов Д.И. (2024). Развитие сельского хозяйства как важная задача обеспечения продовольственной безопасности страны // Продовольственная политика и безопасность. Т. 11, № 1. С. 39–58. https://doi. org/10.18334/ppib.11.1.120624</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тамбовцев В.Л. (2024). Экономическая идеология: варианты пониманий и применения понятия // Вопросы экономики. № 10. С. 5–27. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-5-27</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Телятников Н.Б. (2002). Из истории статистики в Саратовской губернии (1826–1997 гг.) // Вопросы статистики. № 10. С. 74–80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ушачев И.Г., Маслова В.В., Чекалин В.С. (2018). Государственная поддержка сельского хозяйства в России: проблемы, пути их решения // АПК: экономика, управление. № 3. С. 4–12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фудина Е.В. (2015). Развитие сельского хозяйства и продовольственная безопасность России // Успехи современной науки. № 5. С. 55–57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ханин Г.И., Полосова О.И., Иванченко Н.В. (2002). Строительство в России в 1996–2000 гг.: альтернативная оценка темпов развития // Вопросы статистики. № 12. С. 35–42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Холодов П.П. (2012). Развитие сельского хозяйства и продовольственная безопасность России // Российское предпринимательство. Т. 13, № 16. С. 61–67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цхададзе Н.В. (2017). Макроэкономическая стабильность в интерпретации «новых классиков» // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия «Экономика и управление». № 1. С. 243–249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цыганков С.С., Маскаев А.И., Вольчик В.В. (2024). Государственные закупки и инновационная политика в России: взгляд со стороны нарративной экономики // Russian Journal of Economics and Law. Т. 18, № 1. С. 24–35. https://doi. org/10.21202/2782-2923.2024.1.24-35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. (2012). Наука и идеология // Философия экономики: антология / под ред. Д.М. Хаусмана. Москва: Изд-во Института Гайдара. С. 247–264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Якобсон Л.И., Бураков Н.А. (2025). О культуре стратегического планирования экономического развития // Вопросы экономики. № 9. С. 27–42. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-27-42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Briquet J.-L. (2013). Notabili e processi di notabilizzazione nella Francia del diciannovesimo e ventesimo secolo. Ricerche di Storia Politica / Political History Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 279–294. (in Italian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burns A.F., Mitchell W.C. (1946). Measuring business cycles. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref63"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clift B. (2006). The new political economy of dirigisme: French macroeconomic policy, unrepentant sinning and the stability and growth pact. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 8, issue 3, pp. 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-856x.2006.00235.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref64"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cojanu V., Piroșcă G.I. (2022). The failure of communist planning: A perspective from Romania (pp. 227–254). In: J.M. Kovács. (Ed.). Communist planning versus rationality: Mathematical economics and the central plan in Eastern Europe and China. Lanham: Lexington Books.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref65"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dimand R.W. (2020). The Cowles commission and foundation for research in economics. In: M. Vernengo, E.P. Caldentey, J. Ghosh. (Eds.). The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349- 95121-5_3111-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref66"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dyker D.A. (1982). Soviet agriculture since Khrushchev – Decentralisation and dirigisme. The IDS Bulletin, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1982.mp13004005.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref67"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hall P.A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref68"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harcourt B.E. (2023). Cooperation: A political, economic, and social theory. New York: Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref69"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Howarth D. (2002). The French state in the euro‐zone: ‘Modernization’ and legitimizing dirigisme (pp. 145–172). In: K. Dyson. (Ed.). European states and the euro: Europeanization, variation, and convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/0199250251.003.0007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref70"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hu A. (2013). The distinctive transition of China’s five-year plans. Modern China, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 629–639. https://doi. org/10.1177/0097700413499129</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref71"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Javed S.A., Bo Y., Tao L., Dong W. (2023). The ‘Dual Circulation’ development model of China: Background and insights. Rajagiri Management Journal, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-03-2021-0016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref72"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koopmans T.C. (1947). Measurement without theory. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 161–172. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1928627</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref73"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kowalik T. (1987). Lange–Lerner mechanism. In: M. Vernengo, E.P. Caldentey, J. Ghosh. (Eds.). The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1158-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref74"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kwong C.C.L. (2025). China’s 14th five year plan: Novelties and challenges. The Chinese Economy, vol. 58, issue 2, pp. 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2024.2384166</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref75"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lange O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism. The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 53–71. https://doi. org/10.2307/2967660</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref76"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lange O. (1937). On the economic theory of socialism: Part two. The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 123–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref77"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Le Galès P. (1994). Regional economic policies: An alternative to French economic dirigisme? Regional Politics and Policy, vol. 4, issue 3, pp. 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569408420911</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref78"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lerner A.P. (1944). The economics of control: Principles of welfare economics. New York: The Macmillan Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref79"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levy J.D. (1999). Tocqueville’s revenge: State, society, and economy in contemporary France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref80"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maclean M. (1997). Privatisation, dirigisme and the global economy: An end to French exceptionalism? Modern &amp; Contemporary France, vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489708456371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref81"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McDonald J.F. (2009). Graduate education in economics: Microeconomics at Chicago and Yale in the 1960s. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837209090178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref82"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meunier S. (2004). Globalization and Europeanization: A challenge to French politics. French Politics, vol. 2, pp. 125–150. https:// doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref83"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mirowski P. (2007). The mirage of an economics of knowledge. Version 3.0 (Working Paper). https://economix.fr/uploads/source/ doc/workshops/2007_history_economics/Mirowski.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref84"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mirowski P., Nik-Khah E. (2016). The role of the Cowles Commission in the history of information economics. Studia Metodologiczne / Methodological Studies, vol. 36, pp. 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/10.14746/sm.2016.36.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref85"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Müller M. (2011). State dirigisme in megaprojects: Governing the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 43, issue 9, pp. 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref86"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Park H.J. (2004). Between development and the state: Recasting South Korean dirigisme. Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370408434235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref87"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmidt V.A. (1996). From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref88"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shiller R.J. (2019). Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 41, issue 3, pp. 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref89"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsygankov S., Syropyatov V., Volchik V. (2021). Institutional governance of innovations: Novel insights of leadership in Russian public procurement. Economies, vol. 9, issue 4, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref90"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wu W.-J. (2016). Economics of planning policies in China: Infrastructure, location and cities. Abingdon: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref91"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avtonomov V.S. (2024). The fate of «grand theories» in economic science. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki / Issues of Economic Theory, no. 1 (22), pp. 96–105. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_1_96_105. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref92"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bodrunov S.D. (2016). On certain issues concerning the evolution of the economic and social structure of the new generation industrial society. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii / Economic Revival of Russia, no. 3 (49), pp. 5–18. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref93"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Borshchevsky G.A. (2022). Modern discourse of civil service in Russia: A view through the prism of administrative paradigms. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya / Public Administration Issues, no. 2, pp. 34–59. https://doi. org/10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-34-59. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref94"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weber M. (2016). Economy and society: Outline of interpretive sociology. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref95"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veblen T.B. (1984). The theory of the leisure class. Moscow: Progress Publ. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref96"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veblen T.B. (2018). The engineers and the price system. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref97"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V. (2020). Narratives and understanding of economic institutions. Terra Economicus, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 49–69. https:// doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-49-69. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref98"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V. (2022). To the issue of the theory and methodology of narrative economics. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki / Issues of Economic Theory, no. 3, pp. 31–46. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref99"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V. (2024). Ideology and narrative economics. Terra Economicus, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 21–33. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073- 6606-2024-22-3-21-33. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref100"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V. (2025). Ideological drift in Russian economic science. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 133–145. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2025.17.2.133-145. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref101"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Maskaev A.I., Shiriaev I.M., Tsygankov S.S., Fursa E.V., Kot V.V. (2024а). Dualistic and multiple approaches to the study of ideology in economic science. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 16–30. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078- 5429.2024.15.4.016-030. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref102"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Maslyukova E.V., Marian P.A., Skryabin M.V. (2024b). An empirical study of the ideological component in Russian economic science. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 42–59. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2024.16.4.042- 059. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref103"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Fursa E.V. (2024a). Ideology and theoretical narratives in economics. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki / Issues of Economic Theory, no. 4, pp. 7–21. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_4_7_21. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref104"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Fursa E.V. (2024b). Theory and ideology in economics: From Adam Smith to Esther Duflo. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika / Lomonosov Economics Journal, no. 6, pp. 161–186. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130- 0105-6-59-6-10. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref105"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Fursa E.V., Kot V.V., Tsygankov S.S., Shiriaev I.M., Maskaev A.I. (2023). How to ensure the comprehensive development of the Russian innovation system. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 6–17. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078- 5429.2023.14.4.006-017. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref106"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Tsygankov S.S., Maskaev A.I. (2022). Formal institutions of the Russian innovation system in the light of narrative economics. EKO / ECO, no. 10 (580), pp. 110–128. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-10-110-128. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref107"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Tsygankov S.S., Maskaev A.I. (2024). New public management as an extension of neoliberal ideology. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2–16. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003 2024-15-6-1. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref108"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volchik V.V., Tsygankov S.S., Fursa E.V., Shiriaev I.M., Maskaev A.I. (2022). The institutions and mechanisms of the Russian innovation system’s regulation in the mirror of narratives. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 6–23. https://doi. org/10.17835/2078-5429.2022.13.4.006-023. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref109"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gelman V.Ya. (2017). Politics versus policy: Technocratic traps of post-soviet reforms. Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz / The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics “Politeia”, no. 2 (85), pp. 32–59. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref110"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazyev S.Yu. (2018). What policies will ensure priority development of Russian economy? Evraziyskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika / Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, no. 2 (24), pp. 12–16. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref111"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazyev S.Yu. (2020). On the creation of systems of strategic planning and management of scientific and technological development. Innovatsii / Innovations, no. 2 (256), pp. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.26310/2071-3010.2020.256.2.002. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref112"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galbraith J.K. (2008). The new industrial state. Selected works. Moscow: Eksmo Publ. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref113"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Evstigneeva L., Evstigneev R. (1995). Manageability of the economy in the course of reforms. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya / World Eсonomy and International Relations, no. 11, pp. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227- 1995-11-5-14. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref114"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V.M. (2013). From pleasure machines to moral communities (reflections on a new book by Jeffrey Hodgson). Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 7–47. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref115"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhuravlev O.M., Matveev I.A. (2022). State capitalism in Russia: A review article (part 2). Evraziyskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika / Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 47–57. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929- 2022-03-47-57. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref116"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaostrovtsev A.P. (2017). The XVI annual international conference “Leontief readings” – “Russia 1917–2017: European modernization or sonderweg?”. Ekonomicheskaya politika / Economic Policy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 208–217. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994- 5124-2017-2-09. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref117"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kapelyushnikov R. (2022). The adventures of neoliberalism. Logos, vol. 32, no. 4 (149), pp. 1–50. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869- 5377-2022-4-1-49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref118"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kapoguzov E.A. (2017). The role of Keynesian ideas in development of the governmental management paradigm. Istorikoekonomicheskie issledovaniya / Journal of Economic History &amp; History of Economics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 244–256. https://doi. org/10.17150/2308-2588.2017.18(2).244-256. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref119"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kleiner G.B. (2022). Inclusive growth in a circular economy. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii / Economic Revival of Russia, no. 3 (73), pp. 37–44. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-37-44. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref120"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krinichnaya E.P. (2021). Determinant problems of agricultural development in Russia. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki / Bulletin of Agrarian Science, no. 2 (89), pp. 137–145. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2587-666X.2021.2.137. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref121"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuzbozhev E.N., Ryabtseva I.F., Nekrasova A.S. (2013). State economic policy and indicative planning at the enterprise. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika / Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, no. 10 (313), pp. 11–23. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref122"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Latov Yu.V. (2018). The development of economic theory as a reflection competition between etatist and liberal ideologies (pp. 132–148). In: A.P. Zaostrovtsev. (Ed.). Proc. of the 17th Int. conf. “Economic theory: Triumph or crisis?” (Saint Petersburg, February 16–17, 2018). Saint Petersburg: International Centre for Socio-Economic Research “Leontyevskiy Tsentr”. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref123"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levkina A.O. (2017). Connotations of technocracy in the discourse about forms of a society innovative development. Sotsium i vlast / Society and Power, no. 6 (68), pp. 13–20. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref124"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenchuk E.B., Filatov V.I. (2019). Strategic planning as a tool to overcome Russia’s technological backwardness. Mir novoy ekonomiki / The World of New Economy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-2-32-42. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref125"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li D.D. (2025). The Chinese view of the world. Debunking myths about China to prevent global conflict. Yerevan: Fortis Press. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref126"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makarov A.V. (2015). T. Veblen and «engineers technocracy» as an alternative concept of economic governance. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk / The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 3, pp. 166–176. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref127"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mau V.A. (2010). Long-term challenges for Russia’s development and the scientific legacy of Y.T. Gaidar. Ekonomicheskaya politika / Economic Policy, no. 6, pp. 5–11. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref128"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mau V.A. (2025). Economic reforms in the USSR: The last act (1985–1991). On the 40th anniversary of perestroika. Voprosy ekonomiki / Issues of Economics, no. 7, pp. 49–81. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-7-49-81. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref129"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mileykovskiy A.G. (1971). Bourgeois economic theories and the economic policy of imperialist countries. Moscow: Mysl Publ. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref130"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pokidchenko M.G. (2017). The economic policy of Russia: Historical and institutional dominance. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk / The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 3, pp. 7–17. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref131"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polterovich V.M. (2007). About strategies of catching up development for Russia. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii / Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (38), pp. 17–23. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref132"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polterovich V.M. (2016). Institutions of catching-up development (on the project of a new model for economic development of Russia). Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz / Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, no. 5 (47), pp. 34–56. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2016.5.47.2. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref133"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polterovich V.M. (2017). Designing the strategies for socio-economic development: Science vs. ideology. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki / Issues of Economic Theory, no. 1, pp. 55–65. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref134"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polterovich V.M., Popov V.V. (2005). Stimulating growth and stages of development (pp. 137–149). In: E.G. Yasin. (Ed.). Proc. of the 6th Int. sci. conf. “Modernizatsiya ekonomiki i vyrashchivanie institutov” (Moscow, April 5–7, 2005). Moscow: HSE University. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref135"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polushkina T.M. (2020). Organic agriculture: Trends and prospects. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya / Fundamental Research, no. 6, pp. 108–112. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref136"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popova E.V. (2008). Indicative planning as the main method for forming Russia’s long-term socio-economic strategy. Innovatsii / Innovations, no. 9 (119), pp. 15–27. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref137"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Radermacher W.J. (2021). Governing-by-the-numbers / Statistical governance: Reflections on the future of official statistics in a digital and globalised society. Voprosy statistiki / Issues of Statistics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 23–44. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313- 6383-2021-28-4-23-44. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref138"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Radygin A. (2008). State capitalism and the financial crisis: Factors of interaction, costs and prospects. Ekonomicheskaya politika / Economic Policy, no. 6, pp. 88–105. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref139"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skryabin M.V., Maryan P.A., Volchik V.V. (2025). Methodology for the study of theoretical narratives using computer text analysis. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 6–19. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2025.16.3.006-019. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref140"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sochneva E.N., Shadrin V.K., Kravtsov D.I. (2024). Agricultural development as an important task for the country’s food security. Prodovolstvennaya politika i bezopasnost / Food Policy and Security, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39–58. https://doi.org/10.18334/ ppib.11.1.120624. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref141"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tambovtsev V.L. (2024). Economic ideology: Versions of the concept’s acceptations and application. Voprosy ekonomiki / Issues of Economics, no. 10, pp. 5–27. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-5-27. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref142"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Telyatnikov N.B. (2002). From the history of statistics in the Saratov Governorate (1826–1997). Voprosy statistiki / Issues of Statistics, no. 10, pp. 74–80. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref143"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ushachev I.G., Maslova V.V., Chekalin V.S. (2018). State support of agriculture in Russia: Problems, ways of their decision. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie / AIC: Economics, Management, no. 3, pp. 4–12. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref144"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fudina E.V. (2015). Development of agriculture and food security of Russia. Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki / Modern Science’s Achievements, no. 5, pp. 55–57. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref145"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khanin G.I., Polosova O.I., Ivanchenko N.V. (2002). Construction in Russia in 1996–2000: An alternative assessment of development rates. Voprosy statistiki / Issues of Statistics, no. 12, pp. 35–42. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref146"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kholodov P.P. (2012). Development of agriculture and food security in Russia. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo / Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 61–67. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref147"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tskhadadze N.V. (2017). Macroeconomic stability in the interpretation of the “new classical” theory. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i upravlenie» / Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Economy and Management, no. 1, pp. 243–249. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref148"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsygankov S.S., Maskaev A.I., Volchik V.V. (2024). Public procurement and innovation policy in Russia: A perspective of narrative economics. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24–35. https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2024.1.24- 35. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref149"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. (2012). Science and ideology (pp. 247–264). In: D.M. Hausman. (Ed.). The philosophy of economics: An anthology. Moscow: The Gaidar Institute Publ. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref150"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jakobson L.I., Burakov N.A. (2025). On the culture of economic development strategic planning. Voprosy ekonomiki / Issues of Economics, no. 9, pp. 27–42. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-27-42. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref151"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Briquet J.-L. (2013). Notabili e processi di notabilizzazione nella Francia del diciannovesimo e ventesimo secolo. Ricerche di Storia Politica / Political History Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 279–294. (in Italian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref152"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burns A.F., Mitchell W.C. (1946). Measuring business cycles. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref153"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clift B. (2006). The new political economy of dirigisme: French macroeconomic policy, unrepentant sinning and the stability and growth pact. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 8, issue 3, pp. 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-856x.2006.00235.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref154"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cojanu V., Piroșcă G.I. (2022). The failure of communist planning: A perspective from Romania (pp. 227–254). In: J.M. Kovács. (Ed.). Communist planning versus rationality: Mathematical economics and the central plan in Eastern Europe and China. Lanham: Lexington Books.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref155"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dimand R.W. (2020). The Cowles commission and foundation for research in economics. In: M. Vernengo, E.P. Caldentey, J. Ghosh. (Eds.). The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349- 95121-5_3111-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref156"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyker D.A. (1982). Soviet agriculture since Khrushchev – Decentralisation and dirigisme. The IDS Bulletin, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1982.mp13004005.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref157"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hall P.A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref158"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harcourt B.E. (2023). Cooperation: A political, economic, and social theory. New York: Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref159"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Howarth D. (2002). The French state in the euro‐zone: ‘Modernization’ and legitimizing dirigisme (pp. 145–172). In: K. Dyson. (Ed.). European states and the euro: Europeanization, variation, and convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/0199250251.003.0007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref160"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hu A. (2013). The distinctive transition of China’s five-year plans. Modern China, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 629–639. https://doi. org/10.1177/0097700413499129</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref161"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Javed S.A., Bo Y., Tao L., Dong W. (2023). The ‘Dual Circulation’ development model of China: Background and insights. Rajagiri Management Journal, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-03-2021-0016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref162"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koopmans T.C. (1947). Measurement without theory. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 161–172. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1928627</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref163"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kowalik T. (1987). Lange–Lerner mechanism. In: M. Vernengo, E.P. Caldentey, J. Ghosh. (Eds.). The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1158-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref164"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kwong C.C.L. (2025). China’s 14th five year plan: Novelties and challenges. The Chinese Economy, vol. 58, issue 2, pp. 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2024.2384166</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref165"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lange O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism. The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 53–71. https://doi. org/10.2307/2967660</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref166"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lange O. (1937). On the economic theory of socialism: Part two. The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 123–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref167"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Le Galès P. (1994). Regional economic policies: An alternative to French economic dirigisme? Regional Politics and Policy, vol. 4, issue 3, pp. 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569408420911</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref168"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lerner A.P. (1944). The economics of control: Principles of welfare economics. New York: The Macmillan Company.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref169"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levy J.D. (1999). Tocqueville’s revenge: State, society, and economy in contemporary France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref170"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maclean M. (1997). Privatisation, dirigisme and the global economy: An end to French exceptionalism? Modern &amp; Contemporary France, vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489708456371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref171"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McDonald J.F. (2009). Graduate education in economics: Microeconomics at Chicago and Yale in the 1960s. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837209090178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref172"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meunier S. (2004). Globalization and Europeanization: A challenge to French politics. French Politics, vol. 2, pp. 125–150. https:// doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref173"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirowski P. (2007). The mirage of an economics of knowledge. Version 3.0 (Working Paper). https://economix.fr/uploads/source/ doc/workshops/2007_history_economics/Mirowski.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref174"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirowski P., Nik-Khah E. (2016). The role of the Cowles Commission in the history of information economics. Studia Metodologiczne / Methodological Studies, vol. 36, pp. 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/10.14746/sm.2016.36.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref175"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Müller M. (2011). State dirigisme in megaprojects: Governing the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 43, issue 9, pp. 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref176"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Park H.J. (2004). Between development and the state: Recasting South Korean dirigisme. Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370408434235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref177"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmidt V.A. (1996). From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref178"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shiller R.J. (2019). Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 41, issue 3, pp. 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref179"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsygankov S., Syropyatov V., Volchik V. (2021). Institutional governance of innovations: Novel insights of leadership in Russian public procurement. Economies, vol. 9, issue 4, 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref180"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wu W.-J. (2016). Economics of planning policies in China: Infrastructure, location and cities. Abingdon: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
